The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus

被引:218
作者
Hernandez, CJ
Beaupré, GS
Keller, TS
Carter, DR
机构
[1] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, MS Rehabil Res & Dev Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Biomech Engn Div, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Mech Engn, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
bone; elastic modulus; compressive strength; ash; bone volume fraction; mineralization;
D O I
10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00467-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although bone strength and modulus are known to be influenced by both volume fraction and mineral content (ash fraction), the relative influence of these two parameters remains unknown. Single-parameter power law functions are used widely to relate bone volume or ash fraction to bone strength and elastic modulus. In this study we evaluate the potential for predicting bone mechanical properties with two-parameter power law functions of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and ash fraction (a) of the form y = a(BV/TV)(b) alpha (c), (where y is either ultimate strength or elastic modulus). We derived an expression for bone volume fraction as a function of apparent density and ash fraction to perform a new analysis of data presented by Keller in 1994. Exponents b and c for the prediction of bone strength were found to be 1.92 +/- 0.02 and 2.79 +/- 0.09 (mean +/- SE), respectively, with r(2) = 0.97. The value of b was found to be consistent with that found previously, whereas the value of c was lower than values previously reported. For the prediction of elastic modulus we found b and c to be 2.58 +/- 0.02 and 2.74 +/- 0.13, respectively, with r2 = 0.97. The exponent related to ash fraction was typically larger than that associated with bone volume fraction, suggesting that a change in mineral content will, in general, generate a larger change in bone strength and stiffness than a similar change in bone volume fraction. These findings are important for interpreting the results of antiresorptive drug treatments that can cause changes in both ash and bone volume fraction. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 78
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women [J].
Boivin, GY ;
Chavassieux, PM ;
Santora, AC ;
Yates, J ;
Meunier, PJ .
BONE, 2000, 27 (05) :687-694
[2]  
Bruce Martin R., 1998, Skeletal Tissue Mechanics
[3]   COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF BONE AS A 2-PHASE POROUS STRUCTURE [J].
CARTER, DR ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (07) :954-962
[4]   Histomorphometric assessment of the long-term effects of alendronate on bone quality and remodeling in patients with osteoporosis [J].
Chavassieux, PM ;
Arlot, ME ;
Reda, C ;
Wei, L ;
Yates, AJ ;
Meunier, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1997, 100 (06) :1475-1480
[5]  
Currey J D, 1986, Eng Med, V15, P153, DOI 10.1243/EMED_JOUR_1986_015_039_02
[6]   MECHANICAL CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN MINERAL CONTENT OF BONE [J].
CURREY, JD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1969, 2 (01) :1-+
[8]   STRAIN RATE AND MINERAL-CONTENT IN FRACTURE MODELS OF BONE [J].
CURREY, JD .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1988, 6 (01) :32-38
[9]   Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension [J].
Fyhrie, DP ;
Vashishth, D .
BONE, 2000, 26 (02) :169-173
[10]   THE MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF CANCELLOUS BONE [J].
GIBSON, LJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1985, 18 (05) :317-&