Effects of adhesive fixed prosthesis retainer design on resultant resin luting agent thickness

被引:3
作者
Wassell, RW [1 ]
Gagliano, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70015-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Resin cement thickness may influence the success or otherwise of adhesive fixed prostheses and needs to be quantified for future stress analyses. Purpose. This study evaluated the effect of different complexities of retainer preparation design on resultant resin lute thickness. Material and methods. Five retainer designs were evaluated for resin luting thickness (Panavia Ex) after cementation to appropriately selected natural teeth as follows: (1) flat plate retainer; mandibular canine; (2) occlusal rests, mandibular premolar; (3) occlusal rests, proximal grooves, mandibular premolar; (4) modified three-quarter crown, mandibular premolar; and (5) occlusal strut, maxillary premolar. Five samples of each design were prepared in vitro. A mesiodistal and a buccolingual section were obtained from each sample with a diamond saw. Measurements were carried out on the fluorescent cement lute with a confocal microscope. Mean resin thickness and cervical resin thickness were analyzed with analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Results. Resin thickness (mu m) for each of the retainer designs were as follows (mean +/- SD): design 1, 58 +/- 40; design 2, 67 +/- 42; design 3, 80 +/- 28; design 4, 87 +/- 15; and design 5, 85 +/- 29. There were no significant differences among the designs (mean global value 75.4). The three-quarter crown (design 4) had a significantly wider cervical resin thickness (P less than or equal to .01) than designs 1, 2, and 3.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Barrack G, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P428
[2]  
Carlsson G E, 1965, Acta Odontol Scand, V23, P443, DOI 10.3109/00016356509021764
[3]   THE ETCHED CAST METAL RESIN-BONDED (MARYLAND) BRIDGE - A CLINICAL REVIEW [J].
CLYDE, JS ;
BOYD, T .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1988, 16 (01) :22-26
[4]  
Crothers A J, 1995, Dent Update, V22, P190
[5]   3-DIMENSIONAL FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE SHEAR BOND TEST [J].
DEHOFF, PH ;
ANUSAVICE, KJ ;
WANG, ZX .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :126-131
[6]   THE EFFECT OF FILM THICKNESS ON THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF A PROSTHODONTIC ADHESIVE [J].
DIAZARNOLD, AM ;
WILLIAMS, VD ;
AQUILINO, SA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 66 (05) :614-618
[7]   MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION OF RESIN BOND TO ENAMEL AND RETAINER WITH A PHOSPHATE MONOMER RESIN [J].
FERRARI, M ;
CAGIDIACO, MC ;
BRESCHI, R .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1987, 57 (03) :298-301
[8]  
HEDEGARD B, 1973, INT DENT J, V23, P489
[9]   PERFORMANCE OF 400 ADHESIVE BRIDGES FITTED IN A RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY DEPARTMENT [J].
HUSSEY, DL ;
PAGNI, C ;
LINDEN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1991, 19 (04) :221-225
[10]   THE INFLUENCE OF DENTURE DESIGN ON PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL DENTURES [J].
JEPSON, NJA ;
THOMASON, JM ;
STEELE, JG .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1995, 178 (08) :296-300