Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program

被引:163
作者
Hoynes, Hilary [1 ]
Page, Marianne
Stevens, Ann Huff
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Public assistance; Anti poverty programs; Infant health; PARTICIPATION; MORTALITY; IMPACT; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The goal of federal food and nutrition programs in the United States is to improve the nutritional well-being and health of low income families. A large body of literature evaluates the extent to which the Supplemental Program for Women Infants and Children (WIC) has accomplished this goal, but most studies have been based on research designs that compare program participants to non-participants. If selection into these programs is non-random then such comparisons will lead to biased estimates of the program's true effects. In this study we use the rollout of the WIC program across counties to estimate the impact of the program on infant health. We find that the implementation of WIC led to an increase in average birth weight and a decrease in the fraction of births that are classified as low birth weight. We find no evidence that these estimates are driven by changes in fertility or selection into live births. Our preferred estimates suggest that WIC initiation raised average birth weight by 2 g, or by 7 g among infants born to mothers with low education levels. These translate into estimated birth weight increases among participating mothers of approximately 18 to 29g. Estimated treatments on the treated impacts among infants born to participating mothers with low education are of similar magnitude. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 827
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ALMOND D, REV EC STAT IN PRESS
[2]  
Almond D. V., 2006, 0704 MIT DEP EC, DOI [DOI 10.2139/SSRN.961021, 10.2139/ssrn.961021]
[3]  
BAILEY M, 2009, IMPACT US FAMILY PLA
[4]  
Besharov D.J., 2009, EXPANSION WIC ELIGIB
[5]  
Besharov DJ., 2001, Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants, and children program
[6]   Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes [J].
Bitler, MP ;
Currie, J .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 24 (01) :73-91
[7]   From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes [J].
Black, Sandra E. ;
Devereux, Paul J. ;
Salvanes, Kjell G. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (01) :409-439
[8]  
Blank R., 2002, J EC LIT, V40
[9]  
Brien MichaelJ., 2001, Prenatal WIC participation and infant health: Selection and maternal fixed effects
[10]   PAYING FOR PROGRESS: CONDITIONAL GRANTS AND THE DESEGREGATION OF SOUTHERN SCHOOLS [J].
Cascio, Elizabeth ;
Gordon, Nora ;
Lewis, Ethan ;
Reber, Sarah .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 125 (01) :445-482