Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in agricultural soil. 5. Probabilistic risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in sludge-amended soils

被引:13
作者
Jensen, J
Lokke, H
Holmstrup, M
Krogh, PH
Elsgaard, L
机构
[1] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Terr Ecol, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
[2] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Dept Crop Physiol & Soil Sci, Res Ctr Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
ecotoxicology; soil fauna; plants; surfactants; detergent;
D O I
10.1002/etc.5620200810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) can be found in high concentrations in sewage sludge and, hence, may enter the soil compartment as a result of sludge application. Here, LAS may pose a risk for soil-dwelling organisms. In the present probabilistic risk assessment, statistical extrapolation has been used to assess the risk of LAS to soil ecosystems. By use of a log-normal distribution model, the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was estimated for soil fauna, plants, and a combination of these. Due to the heterogeneous endpoints for microorganisms, including functional as well as structural parameters, the use of sensitivity distributions is not considered to be applicable to this group of organisms, and a direct, expert evaluation of toxicity data was used instead. The soil concentration after sludge application was predicted for a number of scenarios and used as the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in the risk characterization and calculation of risk quotients (RQ = PEC/PNEC). A LAS concentration of 3.6 mg/kg was used as the current best estimate of PNEC in all RQ calculations. Three levels of LAS contamination (530, 2,600; and 16,100 mg/kg), three half-lives (10, 25, and 40 d), and five different sludge loads (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t/ha) were included in the risk scenarios. In Denmark, the initial risk ratio would reach 1.5 in a realistic worst-case consideration. For countries not having similar sludge regulations, the estimated risk ratio may initially be considerably higher. However, even in the most extreme scenarios, the level of LAS is expected to be well beyond the estimated PNEC one year after application. The present risk assessment, therefore, concludes that LAS does not pose a significant risk to fauna, plants, and essential functions of agricultural soils as a result of normal sewage sludge amendment. However, risks have been identified in worst-case scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1697
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR HAZARDOUS CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON LOGISTICALLY DISTRIBUTED NOEC TOXICITY DATA [J].
ALDENBERG, T ;
SLOB, W .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1993, 25 (01) :48-63
[2]  
[Anonymous], TENSIDE SURFACT DET
[3]   SURFACTANTS AT LOW CONCENTRATIONS STIMULATE BIODEGRADATION OF SORBED HYDROCARBONS IN SAMPLES OF AQUIFER SANDS AND SOIL SLURRIES [J].
ARONSTEIN, BN ;
ALEXANDER, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1992, 11 (09) :1227-1233
[4]   SOIL MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AS AN INDICATOR OF SOIL FERTILITY - LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF MUNICIPAL SEWAGE-SLUDGE ON AN ARID SOIL [J].
BRENDECKE, JW ;
AXELSON, RD ;
PEPPER, IL .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 25 (06) :751-758
[5]   A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment [J].
Chapman, PM ;
Fairbrother, A ;
Brown, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1998, 17 (01) :99-108
[6]   Terrestrial risk assessment for linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS) in sludge-amended soils [J].
de Wolf, W ;
Feijtel, T .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1998, 36 (06) :1319-1343
[7]  
Elsgaard L, 2001, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V20, P1664, DOI [10.1897/1551-5028(2001)020&lt
[8]  
1664:EARAOL&gt
[9]  
2.0.CO
[10]  
2, 10.1002/etc.5620200807]