Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER - A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm

被引:1288
作者
Wu, GS
Robertson, DH
Brooks, CL
Vieth, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Lilly Res Labs, DC 1513, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol Biol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
MD docking; grid approximations; CDOCKER; CHARMm; p value;
D O I
10.1002/jcc.10306
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The influence of various factors on the accuracy of protein-ligand docking is examined. The factors investigated include the role of a grid representation of protein-ligand interactions, the initial ligand conformation and orientation, the sampling rate of the energy hyper-surface, and the final minimization. A representative docking method is used to study these factors, namely, CDOCKER, a molecular dynamics (MD) simulated-annealing-based algorithm. A major emphasis in these studies is to compare the relative performance and accuracy of various grid-based approximations to explicit all-atom force field calculations. In these docking studies, the protein is kept rigid while the ligands are treated as fully flexible and a final minimization step is used to refine the docked poses. A docking success rate of 74% is observed when an explicit all-atom representation of the protein (full force field) is used, while a lower accuracy of 66-76% is observed for grid-based methods. All docking experiments considered a 41-member protein-ligand validation set. A significant improvement in accuracy (76 vs. 66%) for the grid-based docking is achieved if the explicit all-atom force field is used in a final minimization step to refine the docking poses. Statistical analysis shows that even lower-accuracy grid-based energy representations can be effectively used when followed with full force field minimization. The results of these grid-based protocols are statistically indistinguishable from the detailed atomic dockings and provide up to a sixfold reduction in computation time. For the test case examined here, improving the docking accuracy did not necessarily enhance the ability to estimate binding affinities using the docked structures. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1562
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   A MOLECULAR MECHANICS GRID METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF LIGAND-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS [J].
LUTY, BA ;
WASSERMAN, ZR ;
STOUTEN, PFW ;
HODGE, CN ;
ZACHARIAS, M ;
MCCAMMON, JA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 16 (04) :454-464
[22]  
Mangoni R, 1999, PROTEINS, V35, P153, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990501)35:2<153::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO
[23]  
2-E
[24]   AUTOMATED DOCKING WITH GRID-BASED ENERGY EVALUATION [J].
MENG, EC ;
SHOICHET, BK ;
KUNTZ, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 13 (04) :505-524
[25]   FUNCTIONALITY MAPS OF BINDING-SITES - A MULTIPLE COPY SIMULTANEOUS SEARCH METHOD [J].
MIRANKER, A ;
KARPLUS, M .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1991, 11 (01) :29-34
[26]   VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL-PURPOSE QUANTA(R)3.2/CHARMM(R) FORCE-FIELD [J].
MOMANY, FA ;
RONE, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 13 (07) :888-900
[27]   A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach [J].
Muegge, I ;
Martin, YC .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (05) :791-804
[28]   Small Molecule Docking and Scoring [J].
Muegge, Ingo ;
Rarey, Matthias .
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 17, 2001, 17 :1-60
[29]  
Oberlin D, 1998, J COMPUT CHEM, V19, P71, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980115)19:1<71::AID-JCC6>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-W