Key factors for the successful evaluation and screening of managers of the intellectual property rights speciality

被引：12

作者：

Wang, Ming-Kuen ^{[1
]}

Hwang, Kevin P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Transportat & Commun Management Sci, Tainan 70101, Taiwan

来源：

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 2011年 / 38卷 / 09期

关键词：

Analytical hierarchy process; Evaluation and screening; Key factor; Managers of intellectual property rights speciality; SELECTION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.002

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

This research uses the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to analyze the key factors in evaluating and screening managers of the intellectual property rights speciality in Taiwan, related to industry. Industry can utilize the key factors of human resource management to provide self-growth and obtain competitive advantage opportunities for expanding the global market share. This research summarizes the evaluation and screening criteria of managers of the intellectual property rights speciality via a questionnaire of 29 managerial or technical staff from the IP rights-related industries, technology or management experts from the governmental departments related to IP rights industries, and scholars with backgrounds in IP rights related industries who had actually participated in IP rights managers speciality decisions or related tasks and who had employed AHP screening criteria. The findings include three key factors in evaluating and screening the managers' speciality: evaluating IP rights competency, locating the core patent group competency, and calculating the chance of patents to be granted competency. This research can provide a reference for Taiwan's related industry, when evaluating and screening managers of the IP rights speciality. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

引用

页码：10794 / 10802

页数：9

共 27 条

[1]

ADAMS John., 1987, Merchandising intellectual property

[2]

[Anonymous], BUSINESS ED FORUM

[3]

Bilderbeek R, 1998, SERVICES INNOVATION

[4] Knowledge, information and intellectual property: implications for marketing relationships [J].

Borg, EA .

TECHNOVATION, 2001, 21 (08) :515-524

[5]

CATANO VM, 1998, APPENDIX, V1

[6]

Chang S-H, 2007, J HUMAN RESOURCE MAN, V7, P27

[7]

Davis JulieL., 2001, EDISON BOARDROOM

[8] Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives [J].

Hitt, MA ;

Dacin, MT ;

Levitas, E ;

Arregle, JL ;

Borza, A .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (03) :449-467

[9]

*IND DEV BUR, 2006, MIN EC AFF SERV REL

[10]

Knowles M.S., 1984, MODERN PRACTICE ADUL, V2nd

← 1 2 3 →