Obese patients' perceptions of treatment outcomes and the factors that influence them

被引:120
作者
Foster, GD [1 ]
Wadden, TA [1 ]
Phelan, S [1 ]
Sarwer, DB [1 ]
Sanderson, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.161.17.2133
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite considerable professional consensus that modest weight losses of 5% to 10% are successful for reducing the comorbid conditions associated with obesity, obese patients often desire weight losses 2 to 3 times greater than this. Examining ways to reduce the disparities between treatment expectations and subsequent outcomes, this study evaluated the role of physical characteristics, treatment setting, and mood in patients' evaluations of treatment outcomes. Methods: This study was conducted in a university outpatient weight loss clinic with a sample of 397 obese individuals seeking weight loss by a variety of modalities. Before treatment, participants' heights and weights were measured, and the Beck Depression Inventory and the Goals and Relative Weight Questionnaire were administered. Results: Outcome evaluations ranged from 64.4 +/- 11.1 kg (mean SD) for dream weight to 90.1 +/- 19.1 kg for disappointed weight. Initial body weight was the strongest predictor of disappointed, acceptable, and happy weights (beta = .90, .76, and .57, respectively). Sex (beta = -.37) and height (beta = .37) were the strongest determinants of dream weight. Heavier participants chose higher absolute weights, but the weight loss required to reach each of the outcomes was greater for heavier than for lighter patients. Conclusions: These data signal a therapeutic dilemma in which the amount of weight loss produced by the best behavioral and/or pharmacologic treatments is viewed as even less than disappointing. Patients with the highest pretreatment weights are likely to have the most unrealistic expectations for success.
引用
收藏
页码:2133 / 2139
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Treating the obese patient - Suggestions for primary care practice [J].
Anderson, DA ;
Wadden, TA .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (02) :156-167
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Statistical Bulletin, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, V64, P2
[3]  
Beck A.T., 1993, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
[4]  
BRAY GA, 1998, HDB OBESITY, P953
[5]   ORIGINS AND FUNCTIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT - A CONTROL-PROCESS VIEW [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (01) :19-35
[6]   CONTROL-THEORY - A USEFUL CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK FOR PERSONALITY-SOCIAL, CLINICAL, AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (01) :111-135
[7]  
Cash TF., 1997, The body image workbook
[8]   GOAL-SETTING AND THE DIFFERENTIAL INFLUENCE OF SELF-REGULATORY PROCESSES ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING PERFORMANCE [J].
CERVONE, D ;
JIWANI, N ;
WOOD, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) :257-266
[9]   Lay definitions of ideal weight and overweight [J].
Crawford, D ;
Campbell, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1999, 23 (07) :738-745
[10]   THE REALISTIC TREATMENT OF OBESITY - CHANGING THE SCALES OF SUCCESS [J].
FOSTER, GD ;
KENDALL, PC .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1994, 14 (08) :701-736