Randomization inference for balanced cluster-randomized trials

被引:19
作者
Raab, GM
Butcher, I
机构
[1] Napier Univ, Sch Community Hlth, Edinburgh EH4 2LD, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Div Community Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
COMMUNITY INTERVENTION TRIAL; STATISTICAL DESIGN; PERMUTATION TESTS; PRIMARY-CARE; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1191/1740774505cn075oa
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the choice of randomization tests for inferences from cluster-randomized trials that have been designed to ensure a balanced allocation of clusters to treatments. Methods for covariate-adjusted randomization tests are reviewed and their application to balanced cluster-randomized trials discussed. Two cluster-randomized trials with balanced designs are used to illustrate the choices that can be made in selecting a randomization test, and methods for obtaining confidence intervals for treatment effects are illustrated. The balance imposed by the randomization in these trials makes adjustment for covariates less beneficial than for an unbalanced design. However, the adjusted analyses do not appear generally to have worse properties than the unadjusted ones, and may provide protection against any imbalance that has not been controlled for in the design. The only case when adjustment for covariates may result in worse precision is when a large number of cluster-level covariates are included in the analysis. An expression is provided that allows the size of this effect to be calculated for any given set of cluster-level covariates.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 140
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Identifying settings when permutation tests have nominal size with paired, binary outcome, group randomized trials [J].
Braun, TM ;
Feng, ZD .
JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2003, 15 (06) :653-663
[2]   Optimal permutation tests for the analysis of group randomized trials [J].
Braun, TM ;
Feng, ZD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (456) :1424-1432
[3]  
Brookmeyer R, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2121, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2121::AID-SIM907>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-S
[5]  
BUTCHER I, 2004, THESIS NAPIER U EDIN
[6]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[7]   Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Mollison, J ;
Steen, N ;
Grimshaw, JM ;
Eccles, M .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (02) :192-196
[8]   BREAKING THE MATCHES IN A PAIRED T-TEST FOR COMMUNITY INTERVENTIONS WHEN THE NUMBER OF PAIRS IS SMALL [J].
DIEHR, P ;
MARTIN, DC ;
KOEPSELL, T ;
CHEADLE, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (13) :1491-1504
[9]   Randomization inference and bias of standard errors [J].
Gadbury, GL .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (04) :310-313
[10]  
Gail MH, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1069, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960615)15:11<1069::AID-SIM220>3.3.CO