Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity

被引:49
作者
Chiu, I. [2 ]
Shu, L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
language; creativity; design stimuli; concept generation; engineering design; ENGINEERING DESIGN; DECISION-MAKING; LANGUAGE; GENERATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09544828.2011.603298
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We are motivated to investigate methods to increase creativity in conceptual design since creativity is essential to design success, and no other stage influences final design success as much as conceptual design. Existing work supports that design stimuli may encourage creative concept generation, but does not give details on how to systematically generate stimuli. The established relationship between language and cognition, and the systematic nature of language prompt us to examine its use as design stimuli. Language relationships such as opposition provide a systematic method of generating non-obvious semantic stimuli for design problems. In this paper, we present two experiments, a pen-and-paper and a verbal protocol study, where participants used oppositely related and similarly related word stimuli in conceptual design. We found that designers using oppositely related word stimuli developed more creative concepts. Language analysis revealed how opposite stimuli elicited designer behaviours that may encourage and support creative concept generation. Our empirical results combined with linguistic theory lead us to propose a model explaining the interactions and effects of opposite-stimulus words on concept creativity. This knowledge can be used to facilitate more creative, and ultimately, more successful design.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 296
页数:26
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Adams J.L., 2001, CONCEPTUAL BLOCKBU E
[2]  
Akin O., 1990, Design Studies, V11, P107
[3]  
Akin O., 1998, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V7, P123, DOI [10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00057-5, DOI 10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00057-5]
[4]  
Altshuller G.S., 1996, SUDDENLY INVENTOR E
[5]  
Amabile T.M., 1989, GROWING CREATIVE NUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOL CREAT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8_3
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature
[8]  
[Anonymous], P ASME DETC CIE MONT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence, DOI DOI 10.1015/B978-0-08-051013-2.50018-5
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Semantic Relations and the Lexicon