Articular Cartilage: In Vivo Diffusion-Tensor Imaging

被引:92
作者
Raya, Jose G. [1 ]
Horng, Annie [2 ]
Dietrich, Olaf [3 ]
Krasnokutsky, Svetlana [4 ]
Beltran, Luis S. [1 ]
Storey, Pippa [1 ]
Reiser, Maximilian F. [2 ,3 ]
Recht, Michael P. [1 ]
Sodickson, Daniel K. [1 ]
Glaser, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Clin Radiol, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Josef Lissner Lab Biomed Imaging, Dept Clin Radiol, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[4] NYU, Dept Pathol & Med, Div Rheumatol, Langone Med Ctr,NYU Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
关键词
T2; RELAXATION-TIME; PATELLAR CARTILAGE; HIGH-RESOLUTION; REGIONAL REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF-DIFFUSION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE; RESPECT; MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11110821
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To investigate technical feasibility, test-retest reproducibility, and the ability to differentiate healthy subjects from subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) with diffusion-tensor (DT) imaging parameters and T2 relaxation time. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. All subjects provided written informed consent. DT imaging parameters and T2 (resolution = 0.6 x 0.6 x 2 mm) of patellar cartilage were measured at 7.0 T in 16 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with OA with subtle inhomogeneous signal intensity but no signs of cartilage erosion at clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Ten volunteers were imaged twice to determine test-retest reproducibility. After cartilage segmentation, maps of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and T2 relaxation time were calculated. Differences for ADC, FA, and T2 between the healthy and OA populations were assessed with nonparametric tests. The ability of each MR imaging parameter to help discriminate healthy subjects from subjects with OA was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Test-retest reproducibility was better than 10% for mean ADC (8.1%), FA (9.7%), and T2 (5.9%). Mean ADC and FA differed significantly (P < .01) between the OA and healthy populations, but T2 did not. For ADC, the optimal threshold to differentiate both populations was 1.2 x 10(-3) mm2/sec, achieving specificity of 1.0 (16 of 16) and sensitivity of 0.80 (eight of 10). For FA, the optimal threshold was 0.25, yielding specificity of 0.88 (14 of 16) and sensitivity of 0.80 (eight of 10). T2 showed poor differentiation between groups (optimal threshold = 22.9 msec, specificity = 0.69 [11 of 16], sensitivity = 0.60 [six of 10]). Conclusion: In vivo DT imaging of patellar cartilage is feasible, has good test-retest reproducibility, and may be accurate in discriminating healthy subjects from subjects with OA. ADC and FA are two promising biomarkers for early OA.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 559
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ASCH, E ;
BLOCH, D ;
BOLE, G ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
CHRISTY, W ;
COOKE, TD ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
LONGLEY, S ;
MANKIN, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MEENAN, R ;
MIKKELSEN, W ;
MOSKOWITZ, R ;
MURPHY, W ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
SEGAL, M ;
SOKOLOFF, L ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08) :1039-1049
[2]
Radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis is conditional on interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene variations [J].
Attur, Mukundan ;
Wang, Hwa-Ying ;
Kraus, Virginia Byers ;
Bukowski, Jack F. ;
Aziz, Nazneen ;
Krasnokutsky, Svetlana ;
Samuels, Jonathan ;
Greenberg, Jeffrey ;
McDaniel, Gary ;
Abramson, Steven B. ;
Kornman, Kenneth S. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2010, 69 (05) :856-861
[3]
Gd-DTPA(2-) as a measure of cartilage degradation [J].
Bashir, A ;
Gray, ML ;
Burstein, D .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (05) :665-673
[4]
High-resolution diffusivity Imaging at 3.0 T for the detection of degenerative changes - A trypsin-based arthritis model [J].
Berg, A ;
Singer, T ;
Moser, E .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) :460-466
[5]
AN ENZYMATICALLY INDUCED STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION IN ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE - ITS SIGNIFICANCE WITH RESPECT TO MATRIX BREAKDOWN [J].
BROOM, ND .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (02) :210-218
[6]
DIFFUSION OF SMALL SOLUTES IN CARTILAGE AS MEASURED BY NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE (NMR) SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING [J].
BURSTEIN, D ;
GRAY, ML ;
HARTMAN, AL ;
GIPE, R ;
FOY, BD .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1993, 11 (04) :465-478
[7]
Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays [J].
Constantinides, CD ;
Atalar, E ;
McVeigh, ER .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) :852-857
[8]
Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage [J].
Dardzinski, BJ ;
Mosher, TJ ;
Li, SZ ;
VanSlyke, MA ;
Smith, MB .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) :546-550
[9]
Anisotropy of collagen fibre alignment in bovine cartilage: comparison of polarised light microscopy and spatially resolved diffusion-tensor measurements [J].
de Visser, S. K. ;
Bowden, J. C. ;
Wentrup-Byrne, E. ;
Rintoul, L. ;
Bostrom, T. ;
Pope, J. M. ;
Momot, K. I. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2008, 16 (06) :689-697
[10]
Diffusion tensor imaging of native and degenerated human articular cartilage [J].
Deng, Xiang ;
Farley, Michelle ;
Nieminen, Miika T. ;
Gray, Martha ;
Burstein, Deborah .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (02) :168-171