Translational crossroads for biomarkers

被引:68
作者
Bast, RC
Lilja, H
Urban, N
Rimm, DL
Fritsche, H
Gray, J
Veltri, R
Klee, G
Allen, A
Kim, N
Gutman, S
Rubin, MA
Hruszkewycz, A
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA
[6] diaDexus, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[8] US FDA, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[9] Natl Canc Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
[12] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
A group of investigators met at a Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Workshop to discuss key issues in the translation of biomarker discovery to the development of useful laboratory tests for cancer care. Development and approval of several new markers and technologies have provided informative examples that include more specific markers for prostate cancer, more sensitive tests for ovarian cancer, more objective analysis of tissue architecture and an earlier indication of response to treatment in breast cancer. Although there is no clear paradigm for biomarker development, several principles are clear. Marker development should be driven by clinical needs, including early cancer detection, accurate pretreatment staging, and prediction of response to treatment, as well as monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. Development of a national repository that uses carefully preserved, well-annotated tissue specimens will facilitate new marker development. Reference standards will be an essential component of this process. Both hospital-based and commercial laboratories can play a role in developing biomarkers from discovery to test validation. Partnering of academe and industry should occur throughout the process of biomarker development. The National Cancer Institute is in a unique position to bring together academe, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration to (a) define clinical needs for biomarkers by tumor type, (b) establish analytic and clinical paradigms for biomarker development, (c) discuss ways in which markers from different companies might be evaluated in combination, (cl) establish computational methods to combine data from multiple biomarkers, (e) share information regarding promising markers developed in National Cancer Institute -supported programs, and (f) exchange data regarding new platforms and techniques that can accelerate marker development.
引用
收藏
页码:6103 / 6108
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Cumulative prostate cancer risk assessment with the aid of the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio [J].
Aus, G ;
Becker, C ;
Franzén, S ;
Lilja, H ;
Lodding, P ;
Hugosson, J .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (02) :160-165
[2]
Camp RL, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P1445
[3]
Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays [J].
Camp, RL ;
Chung, GG ;
Rimm, DL .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (11) :1323-1327
[4]
Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer [J].
Cristofanilli, M ;
Budd, GT ;
Ellis, MJ ;
Stopeck, A ;
Matera, J ;
Miller, MC ;
Reuben, JM ;
Doyle, GV ;
Allard, WJ ;
Terstappen, LWMM ;
Hayes, DF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (08) :781-791
[5]
Long-term preservation of antigenicity on tissue microarrays [J].
DiVito, KA ;
Charette, LA ;
Rimm, DL ;
Camp, RL .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2004, 84 (08) :1071-1078
[6]
Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer [J].
Etzioni, R ;
Kooperberg, C ;
Pepe, M ;
Smith, R ;
Gann, PH .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2003, 4 (04) :523-538
[7]
The role of human glandular kallikrein 2 for prediction of pathologically organ confined prostate cancer [J].
Haese, A ;
Graefen, M ;
Becker, C ;
Noldus, J ;
Katz, J ;
Cagiannos, I ;
Kattan, M ;
Scardino, PT ;
Huland, E ;
Huland, H ;
Lilja, H .
PROSTATE, 2003, 54 (03) :181-186
[8]
Hellström I, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P3695
[9]
Judging new markers by their ability to improve predictive accuracy [J].
Kattan, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (09) :634-635
[10]
Combining several screening tests: Optimality of the risk score [J].
McIntosh, MW ;
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (03) :657-664