Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception

被引:83
作者
Chance, Zoe [1 ]
Norton, Michael I. [1 ]
Gino, Francesca [2 ]
Ariely, Dan [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Dept Mkt, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Dept Negotiat Org & Markets, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Mkt, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hindsight bias; lying; motivated reasoning; self-enhancement; MOTIVATED INFERENCE; POSITIVE ILLUSIONS; CAUSAL;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1010658108
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学]; 070403 [天体物理学]; 070507 [自然资源与国土空间规划学]; 090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Researchers have documented many cases in which individuals rationalize their regrettable actions. Four experiments examine situations in which people go beyond merely explaining away their misconduct to actively deceiving themselves. We find that those who exploit opportunities to cheat on tests are likely to engage in self-deception, inferring that their elevated performance is a sign of intelligence. This short-term psychological benefit of self-deception, however, can come with longer-term costs: when predicting future performance, participants expect to perform equally well-a lack of awareness that persists even when these inflated expectations prove costly. We show that although people expect to cheat, they do not foresee self-deception, and that factors that reinforce the benefits of cheating enhance self-deception. More broadly, the findings of these experiments offer evidence that debates about the relative costs and benefits of self-deception are informed by adopting a temporal view that assesses the cumulative impact of self-deception over time.
引用
收藏
页码:15655 / 15659
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
HINDSIGHT BIAS AMONG PHYSICIANS WEIGHING THE LIKELIHOOD OF DIAGNOSES [J].
ARKES, HR ;
SAVILLE, PD ;
WORTMANN, RL ;
HARKNESS, AR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (02) :252-254
[2]
The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence [J].
Baron, RS ;
Vandello, JA ;
Brunsman, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (05) :915-927
[3]
Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Campbell, JD ;
Krueger, JI ;
Vohs, KD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, :1-44
[4]
Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects [J].
Chambers, JR ;
Windschitl, PD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (05) :813-838
[5]
DO POSITIVE ILLUSIONS FOSTER MENTAL-HEALTH - AN EXAMINATION OF THE TAYLOR AND BROWN FORMULATION [J].
COLVIN, CR ;
BLOCK, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 116 (01) :3-20
[6]
A NEW LOOK AT MOTIVATED INFERENCE - ARE SELF-SERVING THEORIES OF SUCCESS A PRODUCT OF MOTIVATIONAL FORCES [J].
DUNNING, D ;
LEUENBERGER, A ;
SHERMAN, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (01) :58-68
[7]
HINDSIGHT NOT EQUAL TO FORESIGHT - EFFECT OF OUTCOME KNOWLEDGE ON JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1975, 1 (03) :288-299
[8]
Goleman D., 1996, Vital lies, simple truths: the psychology of self deception
[9]
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains [J].
Gosling, SD ;
Rentfrow, PJ ;
Swann, WB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (06) :504-528
[10]
GUR RC, 1979, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P147