Impact of discretization methods on the rough set-based classification of remotely sensed images

被引:11
作者
Ge, Y. [1 ]
Cao, F. [1 ]
Duan, R. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
remote sensing; classification; rough set; discretization; image processing; data mining; ACCURACY; RULES;
D O I
10.1080/17538947.2010.494738
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In recent years, the rough set (RS) method has been in common use for remote-sensing classification, which provides one of the techniques of information extraction for Digital Earth. The discretization of remotely sensed data is an important data preprocessing approach in classical RS-based remote-sensing classification. Appropriate discretization methods can improve the adaptability of the classification rules and increase the accuracy of the remote-sensing classification. To assess the performance of discretization methods this article adopts three indicators, which are the compression capability indicator (CCI), consistency indicator (CI), and number of the cut points (NCP). An appropriate discretization method for the RS-based classification of a given remotely sensed image can be found by comparing the values of the three indicators and the classification accuracies of the discretized remotely sensed images obtained with the different discretization methods. To investigate the effectiveness of our method, this article applies three discretization methods of the Entropy/MDL, Naive, and SemiNaive to a TM image and three indicators for these discretization methods are then calculated. After comparing the three indicators and the classification accuracies of the discretized remotely sensed images, it has been found that the SemiNaive method significantly reduces large quantities of data and also keeps satisfactory classification accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 346
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Rough and fuzzy geographical data integration
    Ahlqvist, O
    Keukelaar, J
    Oukbir, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2003, 17 (03) : 223 - 234
  • [2] AHLQVIST O, 2000, SCIENCE, V14, P5
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, Rough Set Theory and Knowledge Acquisition
  • [5] Using rough set theory to identify villages affected by birth defects: the example of Heshun, Shanxi, China
    Bai, Hexiang
    Ge, Yong
    Wang, Jin-Feng
    Liao, Yi Lan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2010, 24 (04) : 459 - 476
  • [6] Spatial data methods and vague regions: A rough set approach
    Beaubouef, Theresa
    Petry, Frederick E.
    Ladner, Roy
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2007, 7 (01) : 425 - 440
  • [7] BERGER AP, 2004, ENVIRON MANAGE, V34, P546
  • [8] Bittner T., 2001, Temporal, Spatial, and Spatio-Temporal Data Mining. First International Workshop, TSDM 2000. Revised Papers (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol.2007), P89
  • [9] BITTNER T, 2001, ROUGH SETS CURRENT T, P445
  • [10] Das S., 2006, P 6 INT C HYBR INT S, P26