Word recall in schizophrenia: A connectionist model

被引:49
作者
Nestor, PG
Akdag, SJ
O'Donnell, BF
Niznikiewicz, M
Law, S
Shenton, ME
McCarley, RW
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brockton VA Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Brockton, MA 02401 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02125 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1176/ajp.155.12.1685
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The authors examined word recall of patients with schizophrenia by using an experimental paradigm generated from connectionist models of memory. Method: Schizophrenic patients and normal comparison subjects first studied and then recalled a list of 32 words of equal difficulty. Both the connectivity (associative strength) and the network size (number of associates) of the words varied in such a way that the list contained equal proportions of four types of words: 1) high connectivity-small network size, 2) low connectivity-small network size, 3) high connectivity-large network size, and 4) low connectivity-large network size. Results: The schizophrenic patients recalled fewer words and showed a particularly pronounced effect of the connectivity of the to-be-remembered words. For the patients, regardless of network size, recall improved substantially for words of high connectivity and declined dramatically for words of tow connectivity. By contrast, the comparison subjects showed the expected effects, with the best recall for words of high connectivity-small network size, followed by words of low connectivity-smalt network size, then by words of high connectivity-targe network size, and finally by words of low connectivity-large network size. Conclusions: Schizophrenia may be characterized by faulty modulation of associative links within a putative lexicon that is thought to be widely distributed across frontal and temporal lobes.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1690
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   ON THE STATUS OF INHIBITORY MECHANISMS IN COGNITION - MEMORY RETRIEVAL AS A MODEL CASE [J].
ANDERSON, MC ;
SPELLMAN, BA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (01) :68-100
[2]  
ANDREASEN N, 1986, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V43, P136
[3]   To repeat or not to repeat: Repetition facilitation and inhibition in sequential retrieval [J].
Arbuthnott, KD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1996, 125 (03) :261-283
[4]   Semantic priming in schizophrenia: An examination of spreading activation using word pronunciation and multiple SOAs [J].
Barch, DM ;
Cohen, JD ;
ServanSchreiber, D ;
Steingard, S ;
Steinhauer, SS ;
vanKammen, DP .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 105 (04) :592-601
[5]   The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexica: A positron emission tomography study [J].
Beauregard, M ;
Chertkow, H ;
Bub, D ;
Murtha, S ;
Dixon, R ;
Evans, A .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (04) :441-461
[6]  
Bleuler E., 1911, DEMENTIA PRAECOX GRO
[7]  
Carmazza A., 1996, NATURE, V380, P485
[8]  
Chapman L.J., 1973, DISORDERED THOUGHT S
[9]   A neural basis for lexical retrieval [J].
Damasio, H ;
Grabowski, TJ ;
Tranel, D ;
Hichwa, RD ;
Damasio, AR .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6574) :499-505
[10]   Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account [J].
Devlin, JT ;
Gonnerman, LM ;
Andersen, ES ;
Seidenberg, MS .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (01) :77-94