Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study

被引:227
作者
Murphy, DJ
Liebling, RE
Verity, L
Swingler, R
Patel, R
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, St Michaels Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Bristol BS2 8EG, Avon, England
[2] Southmead Gen Hosp, N Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background A frequent dilemma for obstetricians is how to keep morbidity to a minimum when faced with arrested progress at full dilatation of the cervix. Our aim was to examine maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal instrumental delivery in theatre and caesarean section, at full dilatation. Methods We did a prospective cohort study of 393 women, who had term, singleton, liveborn, cephalic pregnancies requiring operative delivery in theatre at full dilatation for 1 year. Findings Factors increasing the likelihood of caesarean section included maternal body-mass index greater than 30 (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9), neonatal birthweight greater than 4.0 kg (2.3, 1.3-3.8), and occipitoposterior position (2.5, 1.6-3.9). Women undergoing caesarean section were more likely to have a major haemorrhage (>1 L; 2.8, 1.1-7.6) and extended hospital stay (greater than or equal to6 days; 3.5, 1.6-7.6) than those with vaginal delivery. Babies delivered by caesarean section were more likely to require admission for intensive care (2.6, 1.2-6.0) but less likely to have trauma (0.4, 0.2-0.7) than babies delivered by forceps. Overall neonatal morbidity was low, but a few babies in each group had serious complications (serious trauma, eight vs three; sepsis, six vs 13; and jaundice, ten vs 12 after vaginal delivery and caesarean section, respectively). Major haemorrhage was less likely after delivery by a skilled obstetrician (0.5, 0.3-0.9). Interpretation The data lend support to an aim to deliver women vaginally, unless there are clear signs of cephalopelvic disproportion, and underline the importance of skilled obstetricians supervising complex operative deliveries.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1207
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]  
Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services,The National Childbirth Trust, 1997, CHART ETH RES MAT CA
[3]   A COMPARISON OF THE MORBIDITY OF MIDFORCEPS AND CESAREAN DELIVERY [J].
BASHORE, RA ;
PHILLIPS, WH ;
BRINKMAN, CR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (06) :1428-1435
[4]   KIELLANDS FORCEPS - ASSOCIATION WITH NEONATAL MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY [J].
CHISWICK, ML ;
JAMES, DK .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 1 (6155) :7-9
[5]   EVALUATION OF MIDFORCEPS DELIVERY AS AN ALTERNATIVE [J].
CIBILS, LA ;
RINGLER, GE .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (01) :5-11
[6]  
CLARK SL, 1984, OBSTET GYNECOL, V64, P376
[7]   THE MIDFORCEPS - MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES [J].
DIERKER, LJ ;
ROSEN, MG ;
THOMPSON, K ;
DEBANNE, S ;
LINN, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 152 (02) :176-183
[8]  
*EXP MAT GROUP, 1993, CHANG CHILDB 1
[9]   Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study [J].
Fynes, M ;
Donnelly, V ;
Behan, M ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9183) :983-986
[10]   Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury [J].
Fynes, M ;
Donnelly, VS ;
O'Connell, R ;
O'Herlihy, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :496-500