Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch

被引:64
作者
Kan, AKS [1 ]
Abdalla, HI [1 ]
Gafar, AH [1 ]
Nappi, L [1 ]
Ogunyemi, BO [1 ]
Thomas, A [1 ]
Ola-ojo, OO [1 ]
机构
[1] Lister Hosp, Fertil & Endocrinol Ctr, In Vitro Fertilizat Unit, London SW1W 8RH, England
关键词
clinical; embryo transfer; IVF; prospective study; ultrasound-guided;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/14.5.1259
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In this prospective control study, the pregnancy and implantation rates were compared between ultrasound-guided and clinical touch uterine embryo transfers. In addition, a subset of patients was sought that would particularly benefit from embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance, A total of 187 patients (93 ultrasound and 94 clinical touch) was enrolled. Allocation was random and depended on whether their embryo transfers were done during the 1 h each day in which the ultrasound was available, Pregnancy and implantation rates of 37.8 and 20.4% respectively were achieved when ultrasound was used, compared with 28.9 and 16.2% respectively with clinical touch. This difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate when the number of embryos transferred was controlled. Older women (greater than or equal to 37 years old) had an apparently higher pregnancy rate (38.1 versus 20.4%; not significant) with ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. In the subgroup where the clinician rated the transfer procedure as difficult, there appeared to be a substantial improvement in the pregnancy rate in the group that used ultrasound (54.5 versus 10.0%; not significant). Although our results were not statistically significant, we believe that ultrasound-guided embryo transfers should be used in clinically difficult embryo transfers and in older women, as it appears to improve the pregnancy rate over clinical touch transfers.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1261
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS INTO THE UTERUS - HOW MUCH DO TECHNICAL FACTORS AFFECT PREGNANCY RATES [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
DAVE, R ;
HARPER, J ;
LINEHAN, D ;
RILEY, P ;
CRAFT, I .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :31-36
[2]  
EDWARDS RG, 1980, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V87, P737, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04610.x
[3]   Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization [J].
Fanchin, R ;
Righini, C ;
Olivennes, F ;
Taylor, S ;
de Ziegler, D ;
Frydman, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (07) :1968-1974
[4]  
HURLEY VA, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P559
[5]  
LEONG M, 1986, IN VITRO FERT EMBRYO, V3, P383
[6]  
Prapas Y, 1995, Acta Eur Fertil, V26, P113
[7]   THE CHANGING FACE OF INFERTILITY [J].
SPEIRS, AL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (06) :1390-1394
[8]  
STRICKLER RC, 1985, FERTIL STERIL, V43, P54
[9]  
Woolcott R, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P963