Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: Validation on new cases

被引:19
作者
Bilska-Wolak, AO
Floyd, CE
Lo, JY
Baker, JA
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Duke Adv Imaging Labs, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
computer-aided diagnosis; mammographic masses; validation; mammography; biopsy;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2005.02.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a previously developed computer aid for breast mass classification for mammography on a new, independent database of cases not used for algorithm development. Materials and Methods. A computer aid (classifier) based on the likelihood ratio (LRb) was previously developed on a database of 670 mass cases. The 670 cases (245 malignant) from one medical institution were described using 16 features from the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System lexicon and patient history findings. A separate database of 151 (43 malignant) validation cases were collected that were previously unseen by the classifier. These new validation cases were evaluated by the classifier without retraining. Performance evaluation methods included Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), round-robin, and leave-one-out bootstrap sampling. Results. The performance of the classifier on the training data yielded an average ROC area of 0.90 +/- 0.02 and partial ROC area ((0.90)AUC) of 0.60 +/- 0.06. The exact nonparametric performance on the validation set of 151 cases yielded a ROC area of 0.88 and (0.90)AUC of 0.57. Using a 100% sensitivity cutoff threshold established on the training data (100% negative predictive value), the classifier correctly identified 100% of the malignant masses in the validation test set, while potentially obviating 26% of the biopsies performed on benign masses. Conclusion. The LRb classifier performed consistently on new data that was not used for classifier development. The LRb classifier shows promise as a potential aid in reducing the number of biopsies performed on benign masses.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 1992, BREAST IMAGING REPOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
[3]   Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Floyd, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) :773-778
[4]   Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: A controlled trial [J].
Barton, MB ;
Morley, DS ;
Moore, S ;
Allen, JD ;
Kleinman, KP ;
Emmons, KM ;
Fletcher, SW .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (07) :529-538
[5]   Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? [J].
Berg, WA ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Jackson, VP ;
Bassett, LW ;
Beam, CA ;
Lewis, RS ;
Crewson, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :871-880
[6]  
*BI RADS, 2003, AM COLL RAD BREAST I
[7]   Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer [J].
Bilska-Wolak, AO ;
Floyd, CE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (18) :4219-4237
[8]   Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning [J].
Bilska-Wolak, AO ;
Floyd, CE ;
Nolte, LW ;
Lo, JY .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) :949-958
[9]  
Bishop C. M., 1996, Neural networks for pattern recognition
[10]   A probabilistic expert system that provides automated mammographic-histologic correlation: Initial experience [J].
Burnside, ES ;
Rubin, DL ;
Shachter, RD ;
Sohlich, RE ;
Sickles, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (02) :481-488