A Bayesian framework for parentage analysis: The value of genetic and other biological data

被引:31
作者
Neff, BD [1 ]
Repka, J
Gross, MR
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Zool, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Math, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Zool, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
parentage analysis; paternity; maternity; fractional allocation; maximum likelihood; confidence; microsatellite;
D O I
10.1006/tpbi.2001.1520
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We develop fractional allocation models and confidence statistics for parentage analysis in mating systems. The models can be used, for example, to estimate the paternities of candidate males when the genetic mother is known or to calculate the parentage of candidate parent pairs when neither is known. The models do not require two implicit assumptions made by previous models, assumptions that are potentially erroneous. First, we provide formulas to calculate the expected parentage, as opposed to using a maximum likelihood algorithm to calculate the most likely parentage. The expected parentage is superior as it does not assume a symmetrical probability distribution of parentage and therefore, unlike the most likely parentage, will be unbiased. Second, we provide a mathematical framework for incorporating additional biological data to estimate the prior probability distribution of parentage. This additional biological data might include behavioral observations during mating or morphological measurements known to correlate with parentage. The value of multiple sources of information is increased accuracy of the estimates. We show that when the prior probability of parentage is known, and the expected parentage is calculated, fractional allocation provides unbiased estimates of the variance in reproductive success, thereby correcting a problem that has previously plagued parentage analyses. We also develop formulas to calculate the confidence interval in the parentage estimates, thus enabling the assessment of precision. These confidence statistics have not previously been available for fractional models. We demonstrate our models with several biological examples based on data from two fish species that we study, coho salmon (Oncorhychus kisutch) and bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), In coho, multiple males compete to fertilize a single female's eggs. We show how behavioral observations taken during spawning can be combined with genetic data to provide an accurate calculation of each male's paternity. In bluegill, multiple males and multiple females may mate in a single nest. For a nest, we calculate the fertilization success and the 95% confidence interval of each candidate parent pair. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 331
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   USING PATERNITY ANALYSIS TO MEASURE EFFECTIVE POLLEN DISPERSAL IN PLANT-POPULATIONS [J].
ADAMS, WT ;
GRIFFIN, AR ;
MORAN, GF .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 140 (05) :762-780
[2]  
Avise John C., 1994, pi
[3]   Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand [J].
Burczyk, J ;
Adams, WT ;
Shimizu, JY .
HEREDITY, 1996, 77 :251-260
[4]  
CHAKRABORTY R, 1988, GENETICS, V118, P527
[5]   Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity [J].
Coltman, DW ;
Bancroft, DR ;
Robertson, A ;
Smith, JA ;
Clutton-Brock, TH ;
Pemberton, JM .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1999, 8 (07) :1199-1209
[6]   FRACTIONAL PATERNITY ASSIGNMENT - THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARISON TO OTHER METHODS [J].
DEVLIN, B ;
ROEDER, K ;
ELLSTRAND, NC .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1988, 76 (03) :369-380
[7]   INTERPOPULATION GENE FLOW BY POLLEN IN WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS-SATIVUS [J].
ELLSTRAND, NC ;
MARSHALL, DL .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1985, 126 (05) :606-616
[8]  
Evett I. W., 1998, INTERPRETING DNA EVI
[9]  
Falconer D. S., 1989, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
[10]   BREEDING COMPETITION IN A PACIFIC SALMON (COHO, ONCORHYNCHUS-KISUTCH) - MEASURES OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION [J].
FLEMING, IA ;
GROSS, MR .
EVOLUTION, 1994, 48 (03) :637-657