A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia

被引:79
作者
Philip, BK
Kallar, SK
Bogetz, MS
Scheller, MS
Wetchler, BV
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA
[2] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[4] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,SAN DIEGO,CA 92103
[5] UNIV ILLINOIS,METHODIST MED CTR,PEORIA,IL 61656
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199608000-00019
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Sevoflurane was compared with isoflurane in 246 adult ASA class I-III patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. After administration of midazolam 1-2 mg and fentanyl 1 mu g/kg, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and maintained with either sevoflurane of isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide to maintain arterial blood pressure at +/- 20% of baseline. Fresh gas flows were 10 L/min during induction and 5 L/min during maintenance. Times to eye opening, command response, orientation, and ability to sit without nausea and/or dizziness were significantly faster after sevoflurane. Significantly more sevoflurane patients met Phase 1 of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) Aldrete recovery criteria (greater than or equal to 8) at arrival, 95% vs 81%. Also, significantly more sevoflurane patients were able to complete psychomotor recovery tests during the first 60 min postanesthesia. Discharge times were not different. Sevoflurane patients had significantly lower incidences of postoperative somnolence (15% vs 26%) and of nausea both in the PACU (36% vs 51%) and in the 24-h postdischarge period (9% us 24%). Patient satisfaction was high overall (sevoflurane 97%, isoflurane 93%). We conclude that sevoflurane is a useful inhaled anesthetic for maintenance of ambulatory anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 319
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
AITKEN RCB, 1970, BRIT J HOSP MED, V4, P215
[2]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[3]   USE OF ANALOG SCALES IN RATING SUBJECTIVE FEELINGS [J].
BOND, A ;
LADER, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 47 (SEP) :211-218
[4]  
DEGROOD PMRM, 1987, ANAESTHESIA, V42, P815
[5]   RECOVERY FOLLOWING OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - USE OF ENFLURANE VERSUS PROPOFOL [J].
DING, YF ;
FREDMAN, B ;
WHITE, PF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (06) :447-450
[6]   SEVOFLURANE FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH PROPOFOL [J].
FREDMAN, B ;
NATHANSON, MH ;
SMITH, I ;
WANG, J ;
KLEIN, K ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :823-828
[7]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE IN HEALTHY PATIENTS [J].
FRINK, EJ ;
MALAN, TP ;
ATLAS, M ;
DOMINGUEZ, LM ;
DINARDO, JA ;
BROWN, BR .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :241-245
[8]   RECOVERY PROFILE AFTER DESFLURANE NITROUS-OXIDE VERSUS ISOFLURANE NITROUS-OXIDE IN OUTPATIENTS [J].
GHOURI, AF ;
BODNER, M ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 74 (03) :419-424
[9]   CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND BIOTRANSFORMATION OF SEVOFLURANE IN HEALTHY-HUMAN VOLUNTEERS [J].
HOLADAY, DA ;
SMITH, FR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (02) :100-106
[10]  
LEBENBOMMANSOUR MH, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P936