Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think?

被引:113
作者
Woolhead, G
Calnan, M
Dieppe, P
Tadd, W
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, MRC, Hlth Serv Res Collaborat, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[3] Llandough Hosp, UWCM Acad Ctr, Acad Dept Geriatr Med, Cardiff CF64 2XX, S Glam, Wales
关键词
dignity; older age; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afh045
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: dignity is a complex concept and there is little empirical research to show how older people view dignity. This study, using qualitative methods, explored the concept of dignity from the older person's perspective. Methods: 15 focus groups and two individual interviews were conducted in 12 different settings, with a total of 72 participants. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure a mix of socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender age (65+) and level of fitness. Focus groups were audio-taped and transcribed. The method of constant comparison was used to analyse the data. Results: there was strong evidence to suggest that dignity was salient to the concerns of older people. Dignity was seen as a multi-faceted concept: (i) dignity of identity (self-respect/esteem, integrity, trust); (ii) human rights (equality, choice); and (iii) autonomy (independence, control). Examples of dignity being jeopardised rather than being enhanced were given. A loss of self-esteem arose from being patronised, excluded from decision-making, and being treated as an 'object'. Lack of integrity in society meant that there was an inability to trust others and an increased vulnerability. Equality was an important issue but many felt that government policies did not support their rights. Conclusions: this work identifies the different ways dignity is conceptualised by older people. The evidence showed that person centred care for older people needs to be specifically related to communication, privacy, personal identity and feelings of vulnerability. It provides evidence for policy makers and professionals to tailor policies and practices to the needs of the older person.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 170
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Ignored and Invisible? Carers' Experience of the NHS
[3]  
[Anonymous], ESS CAR PAT FOC BENC
[4]  
Barney G., 1967, Awareness of Dying, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203793206
[5]   Ageing and public satisfaction with the health service: an analysis of recent trends [J].
Calnan, M ;
Almond, S ;
Smith, N .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (04) :757-762
[6]  
*CHART FUND RIGHTS, 2000, OFF J EUR COMM
[7]   Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model [J].
Chochinov, HM ;
Hack, T ;
McClement, S ;
Kristjanson, L ;
Harlos, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (03) :433-443
[8]  
*DEP HLTH, 1999, 419711 CMMN DEP HLTH
[9]  
*DEP HLTH, 1969, CMND3975
[10]  
*EUR COMM 5 FRAM, 2001, QLG200100888 EUR COM