DNA vaccines for aquacultured fish

被引:169
作者
Lorenzen, N
LaPatra, SE
机构
[1] Danish Inst Food & Vet Res, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Clear Springs Foods Inc, Div Res, Buhl, ID 83316 USA
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2005年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
animal welfare; consumer perceptions; cost-benefit; delivery; deoxyribonucleic acid vaccine; farmed fish; field-testing glycoprotein plasmid; protective mechanisms; regulatory issues; safety; viral diseases;
D O I
10.20506/rst.24.1.1565
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) vaccination is based on the administration of the gene encoding the vaccine antigen, rather than the antigen itself. Subsequent expression of the antigen by cells in the vaccinated hosts triggers the host immune system. Among the many experimental DNA vaccines tested in various animal species as well as in humans, the vaccines against rhabdovirus diseases in fish have given some of the most promising results. A single intramuscular (IM) injection of microgram amounts of DNA induces rapid and long-lasting protection in farmed salmonids against economically important viruses such as infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV). DNA vaccines against other types of fish pathogens, however, have so far had limited success. The most efficient delivery route at present is IM injection, and suitable delivery strategies for mass vaccination of small fish have yet to be developed. In terms of safety, no adverse effects in the vaccinated fish have been observed to date. As DNA vaccination is a relatively new technology, various theoretical and long-term safety issues related to the environment and the consumer remain to be fully addressed, although inherently the risks should not be any greater than with the commercial fish vaccines that are currently used. Present classification systems lack clarity in distinguishing DNA-vaccinated animals from genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which could raise issues in terms of licensing and public acceptance of the technology. The potential benefits of DNA vaccines for farmed fish include improved animal welfare, reduced environmental impacts of aquaculture activities, increased food quality and quantity, and more sustainable production. Testing under commercial production conditions has recently been initiated in Canada and Denmark.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 213
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] *AGR ENV BIOT COMM, 2002, AN BIOT REP SEPT 200
  • [2] Anderson ED, 1996, MOL MAR BIOL BIOTECH, V5, P105
  • [3] Anderson ED, 1996, MOL MAR BIOL BIOTECH, V5, P114
  • [4] ANDERSON ED, 2000, METHODS MOL MED DNA, P105
  • [5] [Anonymous], REGULATION DNA VACCI
  • [6] ARMSTRONG R, 1993, CAN VET J, V34, P312
  • [7] Out on the farm with DNA vaccines
    Beard, CW
    Mason, PW
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 16 (13) : 1325 - 1328
  • [8] The glycoprotein of a fish rhabdovirus profiles the virus-specific T-cell repertoire in rainbow trout
    Boudinot, P
    Bernard, D
    Boubekeur, S
    Thoulouze, MI
    Bremont, M
    Benmansour, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2004, 85 : 3099 - 3108
  • [9] Combined DNA immunization with the glycoprotein gene of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus and infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus induces double-specific protective immunity and nonspecific response in rainbow trout
    Boudinot, P
    Blanco, M
    de Kinkelin, P
    Benmansour, A
    [J]. VIROLOGY, 1998, 249 (02) : 297 - 306
  • [10] Christie KE, 1997, DEV BIOLOGICALS, V90, P191