Cisplatin chemotherapy (without erythropoietin) and risk of life-threatening thromboembolic events in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: the tip of the iceberg? A review of the literature

被引:30
作者
Anders, Jon C. [2 ]
Grigsby, Perry W. [3 ]
Singh, Anurag K. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Radiat Oncol Associates, Albuquerque, NM 87109 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Cervical Cancer; Erythropoietin; Prospective Trial; Thromboembolic Event; Uterine Cervix;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-1-14
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The risk of severe cardiovascular toxicity, specifically thromboembolic events (TE), in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent irradiation and cisplatin chemotherapy is reported to be less than 1% in several large prospective trials. However, the anecdotal risk appears to be far higher. Results and discussion: A review of several prospective trials demonstrates no treatment related grade 4 cardiovascular toxicities and only two grade 5 toxicities in 1424 (0.1%) collective patients. A recent publication and our own unpublished experience finds 6 of 128 (4.7%) patients developed grade 4 to 5 cardiovascular (thrombosis/embolism) toxicity. The differenc in incidence of severe or life threatening cardiovascular toxicity of 0.1 versus 4.7% is highly statistically significant (p < 0.00001.) Conclusion: This dramatic difference in incidence of cardiovascular toxicity raises the possibility that cardiovascular toxicities were inadequately reported on the listed prospective trials. For those patients enrolled in prospective trials, we suggest that thromboses should be diligently documented and reported. Only after the true incidence of thromboses is established can we implement appropriate levels of early screening and intervention that may prevent life threatening complications.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: Results from the Italian Multicenter Randomized study [J].
Benedetti-Panici, P ;
Greggi, S ;
Colombo, A ;
Amoroso, M ;
Smaniotto, D ;
Giannarelli, D ;
Amunni, G ;
Raspagliesi, F ;
Zola, P ;
Mangioni, C ;
Landoni, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :179-188
[2]  
DUSENBERY KE, 1991, CANCER, V67, P2786, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910601)67:11<2786::AID-CNCR2820671112>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-H
[4]  
ICLI F, 1993, CANCER, V72, P587, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930715)72:2<587::AID-CNCR2820720242>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-V
[6]   Thromboembolic events in patients treated with definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy for invasive cervical cancer [J].
Jacobson, GM ;
Kamath, RS ;
Smith, BJ ;
Goodheart, MJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (02) :470-474
[7]   Perioperative and postoperative complications of intracavitary radiation for FIGO Stage I-III carcinoma of the cervix [J].
Jhingran, A ;
Eifel, PJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1177-1183
[8]   PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF INTRACAVITARY GYNECOLOGIC BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
LANCIANO, R ;
CORN, B ;
MARTIN, E ;
SCHULTHEISS, T ;
HOGAN, WM ;
ROSENBLUM, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (05) :969-974
[9]   Extended field radiation and cisplatin for stage IIB and IIIB cervical carcinoma [J].
Malfetano, JH ;
Keys, H ;
Cunningham, MJ ;
Gibbons, S ;
Ambros, R .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 67 (02) :203-207
[10]   Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J].
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Lu, JD ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Levenback, C ;
Stevens, RE ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, DM ;
Mutch, DG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1137-1143