Limited-sampling models for irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: Prediction of biliary index and intestinal toxicity

被引:60
作者
Mick, R
Gupta, E
Vokes, EE
Ratain, MJ
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO,DEPT MED,PRITZKER SCH MED,COMM CLIN PHARMACOL,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[2] UNIV CHICAGO,PRITZKER SCH MED,CTR CANC RES,CHICAGO,IL 60637
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.7.2012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To construct limited-sampling models (LSMs) for irinotecan (CPT-II) pharmacokinetic [PK] measures. Materials and Methods: The recommended phase II dose of weekly CPT-11 administered as a 90-minute infusion is 145 mg/m(2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and maximal antidiarrheal support. Diarrhea is the dose-limiting toxicity. Previously, we demonstrated a highly significant correlation between severity of diarrhea and biliary index (BI), the estimated biliary exposure of SN-38. Bs was the product of total CPT-II area under the concentration-time curve (AUG) and the relative area ratio of SN-38 to SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). At 145 mg/m(2), PK data were available for 40 patients; 36 were also assessable for intestinal toxicity. Total plasma concentrations of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G from 1.0 to 11.5 hours from the start of the infusion were evaluated. CPT-11 concentration at each rime point, t, is denoted by CPT-11(t). LSMs were constructed by stepwise linear regression, on a training set (n = 25), and were validated on a test set (n = 15). Results: LSMs for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G AUCs displayed excellent fit to the training set (R(2) = .87, 0.75, and .98, respectively). AUC(CPT-11) = 5.25 . CPT-11(3.0) + 20.60 . CPT-11(11.5) + 1,520.53; AUC(SN-38) = 5.38 . SN-38(3.5) + 33.61 . SN-38(11.5) - 7.73; and AUC(SN-38G) = 10.73 . SN-38G(9.5) + 20.66 . SN-38(11.5) + 142.69. BI at each time point (denoted BIt) was calculated as CPT-11(t) . (SN-38(t)/SN-38G(t)). Several promising LSMs were defined by BI3.5 paired with BI7.5 (R(2) = .63) or BI9.5 (R(2) = .76), or BI5.5 paired with BI9.5 (R(2) = .76). predicted BI from each model (categorized into low, intermediate, or high) accurately predicted observed intestinal toxicity grade (P less than or equal to .005). Conclusion: These LSMs appear to accurately predict PK parameters of CPT-11. Notably, BI, predicted from several LSMs, accurately predicted intestinal toxicity and thus may be useful for future trials that use adaptive control with feedback. (C) 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2012 / 2019
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT OF DIARRHEA AND THE CONCENTRATION OF SN-38, AN ACTIVE METABOLITE OF CPT-11, IN THE INTESTINE AND THE BLOOD-PLASMA OF ATHYMIC MICE FOLLOWING INTRAPERITONEAL ADMINISTRATION OF CPT-11
    ARAKI, E
    ISHIKAWA, M
    IIGO, M
    KOIDE, T
    ITABASHI, M
    HOSHI, A
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1993, 84 (06): : 697 - 702
  • [2] IDENTIFICATION OF THE METABOLITES OF IRINOTECAN, A NEW DERIVATIVE OF CAMPTOTHECIN, IN RAT BILE AND ITS BILIARY-EXCRETION
    ATSUMI, R
    SUZUKI, W
    HAKUSUI, H
    [J]. XENOBIOTICA, 1991, 21 (09) : 1159 - 1169
  • [3] PHASE-I AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF IRINOTECAN (CPT-11) ADMINISTERED DAILY FOR 3 CONSECUTIVE DAYS EVERY 3 WEEKS IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS
    CATIMEL, G
    CHABOT, GG
    GUASTALLA, JP
    DUMORTIER, A
    COTE, C
    ENGEL, C
    GOUYETTE, A
    MATHIEUBOUE, A
    MAHJOUBI, M
    CLAVEL, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [4] CHABOT GG, 1995, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V36, P463, DOI 10.1007/s002800050350
  • [5] POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF IRINOTECAN (CPT-11) AND ACTIVE METABOLITE SN-38 DURING PHASE-I TRIALS
    CHABOT, GG
    ABIGERGES, D
    CATIMEL, G
    CULINE, S
    DEFORNI, R
    EXTRA, JM
    MAHJOUBI, H
    HERAIT, P
    ARMAND, JP
    BUGAT, R
    CLAVEL, M
    MARTY, ME
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) : 141 - 151
  • [6] DEFORNI M, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P4347
  • [7] DRAPER NR, 1981, APPLIED REGRESSION A, P70
  • [8] Gupta E, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P1309
  • [9] GUPTA E, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P3723
  • [10] Gupta E., 1996, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V59, P197, DOI 10.1038/sj.clpt.1996.289