The impact of the German feed-in tariff scheme on innovation: Evidence based on patent filings in renewable energy technologies

被引:106
作者
Boehringer, Christoph [1 ]
Cuntz, Alexander [2 ]
Harhoff, Dietmar [3 ]
Asane-Otoo, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Econ, Ammerlander Heerstr 114-118, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Expert Commiss Res & Innovat, Pariser Pl 6, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Max Planck Inst Innovat & Competit, Marstallpl 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
Renewable energy promotion; Feed-in tariffs; Innovation; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY INSTRUMENTS; TECHNICAL CHANGE; COUNT DATA; DIFFUSION; US; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
Over the last two decades, feed-in tariffs have pushed the massive expansion of electricity from renewable energy sources in Germany. Between 1991 and 1999, feed-in tariffs were prescribed through the Electricity Feed-in Law - the so-called Stromeinspeisungsgesetz (SEG) - at relatively moderate rates. From 2000 onwards, the SEG was replaced by the Renewable Energy Sources Act - the so-called Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) - with much higher subsidy rates. The rise in subsidies to renewable power generation under the EEG came along with a substantial increase in electricity prices provoking an intense public debate on the benefits of renewable energy promotion. In our regression analysis, we assess one popular justification for feed-in tariffs: the demand side effect of induced innovation. We find that the innovation impact of the German feed-in tariff scheme over the last two decades supports the positive innovation hypothesis. However, the inducement effect of the feed-in tariff scheme under the EEG is not significantly different from that of the SEG. Given the drastic cost of the EEG, we caution against the appraisal of the EEG feed-in tariff scheme solely on the grounds of its impact on technological innovation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 553
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models [J].
Allison, PD ;
Waterman, RP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2002, VOL 32, 2002, 32 :247-265
[2]
[Anonymous], DEV REN EN SOURC GER
[3]
[Anonymous], DIME
[4]
[Anonymous], EEG ZAHL VERG DIFF E
[5]
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]
[Anonymous], IEA REN INF STAT
[7]
[Anonymous], ENTW EINSP STROM ERN
[8]
[Anonymous], RD D BUDG
[9]
[Anonymous], 2004, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY
[10]
[Anonymous], 1986, LTD DEPENDENT QUALIT