Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery

被引:54
作者
Durnwald, C [1 ]
Mercer, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, MetroHlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
uterine rupture; cesarean delivery; vaginal birth after cesarean section;
D O I
10.1067/S0002-9378(03)01056-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the risks and benefits of single-layer uterine closure at cesarean delivery on the index and subsequent pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of women delivered of their first live-born infants by primary low transverse cesarean delivery (1989-2001) and their subsequent pregnancy at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Of 768 women studied, 267 had single-layer and 501 had double-layer uterine closures in the index pregnancy. Single-layer closure was associated with slightly decreased blood loss (646 vs 690 mL, P<.01), operative time (46 vs 52 minutes, P<.001), endometritis (13.5% vs 25.5%, P<.001), and postoperative stay (3.5 vs 4.1 days, P<.001). In the second pregnancy, prior single-layer closure was not associated with uterine rupture after a trial of labor (0% vs 1.2%, P = .30), or other maternal or infant morbidities. Prior single-layer closure was associated with increased uterine windows (3.5% vs 0.7%, P =.046) at subsequent cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Single-layer uterine closure is associated with decreased infectious morbidity in the index surgery, but not uterine rupture or other adverse outcomes in the subsequent gestation.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 929
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture [J].
Bujold, E ;
Bujold, C ;
Hamilton, EF ;
Harel, F ;
Gauthier, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1326-1330
[2]   One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: The next pregnancy [J].
Chapman, SJ ;
Owen, J ;
Hauth, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (01) :16-18
[3]   The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture [J].
Cruikshank, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) :295-296
[4]   TRANSVERSE UTERINE INCISION CLOSURE - ONE VERSUS 2 LAYERS [J].
HAUTH, JC ;
OWEN, J ;
DAVIS, RO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :1108-1111
[5]  
JELSEMA RD, 1993, J REPROD MED, V38, P393
[7]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SINGLE LAYER AND CONVENTIONAL CLOSURE OF UTERINE INCISION IN CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
LAL, K ;
TSOMO, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1988, 27 (03) :349-352
[8]   IS IT SAFE TO REPAIR LOW TRANSVERSE CESAREAN-SECTION IN ONE LAYER [J].
MALKAMY, H ;
ARDEKANY, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 41 (01) :93-94
[9]  
Ohel G, 1996, J Matern Fetal Med, V5, P366, DOI 10.3109/14767059609018417
[10]  
PRITCHARD JA, 1976, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P903