Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection - Prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort

被引:221
作者
White, PM [1 ]
Teasdale, EM
Wardlaw, JM
Easton, V
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, So Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] So Gen Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Inst Neurol Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Clin Neurosci, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Dept Med Stat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
aneurysm; intracranial; computed tomography (CT); angiography; digital subtraction angiography; comparative studies; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma16739
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA to detect aneurysms. CT angiography, three-dimensional time-df-flight angiography, and intraarterial DSA were performed contemporaneously. Film hard-copy images and maximum intensity projection reconstructions of the CT angiograms and MR angiograms were reviewed at different times. RESULTS: The accuracy per patient for the best observer was 0.87 at CT angiog- and 0.85 at MR angiography. The accuracy per aneurysm for the best was 0.73 at CT angiography and 0.67 at MR angiography. Differences between readers and modalities were not significant. Interobserver agreement was good: K value of 0.73 for CT angiography and of 0.74 for MR angiography. The sensitivity fbr detection of aneurysms smatter than 5 mm was 0.57 for Cf angiography and 0.35 for MR angiography compared with 0.94 and 0.86, respectively, for of aneurysms 5 mm or larger. The accuracy of both CT angiography and angiography was lower for detection of internal carotid artery aneurysms compared with that at other sites. With low observer confidence, the likelihood of correct interpretation was significantly poorer. CONCLUSION: CT angiography and MR angiography have limited sensitivity in the detection of small aneurysms but good interobserver agreement. There is no significant difference in diagnostic performance between the noninvasive modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 749
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A., 2019, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
ALBERICO RA, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P1571
[3]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P402
[4]  
ANZALONE N, 1995, NEURORADIOLOGY, V37, P257
[5]   Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with MR-angiography - Our experience and a review of the literature [J].
Aprile, I ;
Biasizzo, E ;
Lavaroni, A ;
Budai, R ;
Iaiza, F ;
Janes, PP ;
Fabris, G .
RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1996, 9 (05) :541-550
[6]  
Armitage P, 1987, STAT METHODS MED RES, V2, P117
[7]   Intracranial aneurysms: Detection and characterization with MR angiography with use of an advanced postprocessing technique in a blinded-reader study [J].
Atlas, SW ;
Sheppard, L ;
Goldberg, HI ;
Hurst, RW ;
Listerud, J ;
Flamm, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) :807-814
[8]  
Atlas SW, 1997, NEUROIMAG CLIN N AM, V7, P709
[9]  
BOSMANS H, 1995, NEURORADIOLOGY, V37, P262
[10]  
Brenner H, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P981, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<981::AID-SIM510>3.0.CO