Epigeic Collembola in winter wheat under organic, integrated and conventional farm management regimes

被引:51
作者
Alvarez, T [1 ]
Frampton, GK [1 ]
Goulson, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Biol Sci, Biodivers & Ecol Div, Southampton SO16 7PX, Hants, England
关键词
pesticide effects; farming system; arable; arthropods; United Kingdom;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00195-X
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Community characteristics of Collembola assemblages in conventional, integrated and organic fields of winter wheat were compared among three randomly chosen areas in England using analysis of similarities, cluster analysis, multi-dimensional scaling and several measures of diversity and evenness. Indicator values were used to identify indicator species. Significant differences were found in the abundance of most species and in community structure among the three geographical regions but few differences between the farming regimes were significant. Despite a lack of significant differences among regimes, Entomobrya multifasciata and Isotomurus spp. were consistently, although not significantly more common in conventional than organic fields whereas the opposite was true for Isotoma viridis and Isotoma notabilis. Farming regime significantly affected the abundance of Sminthurinus elegans and Sminthurus viridis but the effect differed between geographical regions. Community composition and species dominance were influenced by farming regime, but no species were indicative of the different farming systems, as most occurred ubiquitously in all fields. Organically and conventionally farmed fields were found not to differ significantly from each other in community composition, but both differed from integrated fields. These findings are compared with the results from other recent European studies of the effects of farming systems on arthropods and their wider ecological implications are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 110
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, IDENTIFICATION KEYS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 296 JNCC
[3]  
ARMSTRONG G, 1995, PEDOBIOLOGIA, V39, P231
[4]   Functional aspects of soil animal diversity in agricultural grasslands [J].
Bardgett, RD ;
Cook, R .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1998, 10 (03) :263-276
[5]  
Begon M., 1990, ECOLOGY INDIVIDUALS
[6]   FARMING SYSTEMS AND INSECT PREDATORS [J].
BOOIJ, CJH ;
NOORLANDER, J .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 40 (1-4) :125-135
[7]   AN ORDINATION OF THE UPLAND FOREST COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN [J].
BRAY, JR ;
CURTIS, JT .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1957, 27 (04) :326-349
[8]  
BRUSSAARD L, 1990, NETH J AGR SCI, V38, P283
[9]   A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF ECOSYSTEM HEALTH [J].
CAIRNS, J ;
MCCORMICK, PV ;
NIEDERLEHNER, BR .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1993, 263 (01) :1-44
[10]   Measuring the responses of macroinvertebrate communities to water pollution: A comparison of multivariate approaches, biotic and diversity indices [J].
Cao, Y ;
Bark, AW ;
Williams, WP .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1996, 341 (01) :1-19