An appraisal of Sustainable Grazing Systems: the program, the triple bottom line impacts and the sustainability of grazing systems

被引:16
作者
Mason, WK
Lodge, GM
Allan, CJ
Andrew, MH
Johnson, T
Russell, B
Simpson, IH
机构
[1] RPC Solut, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
[2] NSW Agr, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia
[3] Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[4] URS Sustainable Dev, Hackney, SA 5069, Australia
[5] SGS Steering Grp, Newbridge, NSW 2795, Australia
[6] SGS Extens Facilitator, E Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE | 2003年 / 43卷 / 7-8期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA03043
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The Sustainable Grazing Systems (SGS) Program operated across the high rainfall zone (HRZ, annual rainfall > 600 mm/year) of southern Australia from July 1996 to June 2001. An additional year ( the harvest year) was added, to provide time for focussed analysis and product development. A survey of livestock producers across the HRZ confirmed achievement of the goal that at least 2000 producers adopted ( and a further 5000 were trialing) more profitable and sustainable grazing systems as a result of the program. SGS was established to address declining pasture productivity and emerging environmental problems in the grazing systems of the HRZ, and though initially focussed on the twin goals of profitability and sustainability, the program evolved to formally include social issues and the full 'triple bottom line' approach. Within SGS, success was defined as the extent to which the program was able to assist the grazing industries build financial, social and environmental capital. The suite of papers in this Special Edition provides a comprehensive account of the research and extension 'results' from the SGS Program. Rather than summarising those results, this paper reviews and reflects on the triple bottom line outcomes; the contribution of SGS to the elements of a sustainable grazing system; the impact of grazing method on production and sustainability; and the outcomes from the harvest year. The final section examines the SGS structures and processes that most contributed to the success of the program and advances some suggestions for improvements to future R, D E programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1082
页数:22
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Evaluation of the impact of SGS on livestock producers and their practices [J].
Allan, CJ ;
Mason, WK ;
Reeve, IJ ;
Hooper, S .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2003, 43 (7-8) :1031-1040
[2]  
Allen P., 1991, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V6, P34, DOI 10.1017/S0889189300003787
[3]  
ANDERSON CA, 2003, AUSTR J EXPT AGR, V43, P195
[4]   Key features of the regional producer network for enabling social learning [J].
Andrew, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2003, 43 (7-8) :1015-1029
[5]   The Sustainable Grazing Systems National Experiment. 2. Scientific outcomes and effectiveness of the research and development processes [J].
Andrew, MH ;
Lodge, GM ;
Mason, WK ;
Price, RJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2003, 43 (7-8) :993-1013
[6]   The sustainable grazing systems national experiment. 1. Introduction and methods [J].
Andrew, MH ;
Lodge, GM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2003, 43 (7-8) :695-709
[7]   Soil water extraction by dryland crops, annual pastures, and lucerne in south-eastern Australia [J].
Angus, JF ;
Gault, RR ;
Peoples, MB ;
Stapper, M ;
van Herwaarden, AF .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (02) :183-192
[8]  
[Anonymous], SINGLE BOTTOM LINE S
[9]  
[Anonymous], P 6 AUSTR SOC AGR C
[10]  
[Anonymous], P 10 AUSTR AGR C HOB