Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature

被引:483
作者
Eck, Jason C. [1 ]
Nachtigall, Dean [1 ]
Humphreys, S. Craig [2 ]
Hodges, Scott D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, York, PA 17403 USA
[2] Ctr Sports Med & Orthopaed, Chattanooga, TN 37404 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2007.04.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous investigators have reported on benefits and risks associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but there are limited comparison data available. Additionally, much of the data is from retrospective studies and case series. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the literature and perform a meta-analysis of pain relief and risk of complications associated with vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of the literature on effectiveness of pain control and risk of complications after vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty. Outcomes measures include visual analog scale and complications. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed. All studies providing information on pain relief and complications were included. Preoperative, postoperative, and change in visual analog scale (VAS) scores were tabulated. Data were analyzed to identify if a significant improvement in the VAS score occurred. Changes in the VAS scores were compared for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to determine if there was a significant difference. RESULTS: A total of 1,036 abstracts were identified. Of these, 168 studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean pre- and postoperative VAS scores for vertebroplasty were 8.36 and 2.68, respectively, with a mean change of 5.68 (p<.001). The mean pre- and postoperative VAS scores for kyphoplasty were 8.06 and 3.46, respectively, with a mean change of 4.60 (p<.001). There was statistically greater improvement found with vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty (p<.001). The risk of new fracture was 17.9% with vertebroplasty versus 14.1% with kyphoplasty (p<.01). The risk of cement leak was 19.7% with vertebroplasty versus 7.0% with kyphoplasty (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty provided significant improvement in VAS pain scores. Vertebroplasty had a significantly greater improvement in pain scores but also had statistically greater risk of cement leakage and new fracture. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 497
页数:10
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]
Al-Assir I, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P159
[2]
Alvarez L, 2006, SPINE, V31, P1113
[3]
Predictors of outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures [J].
Alvarez, L ;
Pérez-Higueras, A ;
Granizo, JJ ;
de Miguel, I ;
Quiñones, D ;
Rossi, RE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) :87-92
[4]
Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors:: postprocedural outcome and quality of life [J].
Alvarez, L ;
Pérez-Higueras, A ;
Quiñones, D ;
Calvo, E ;
Rossi, RE .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (04) :356-360
[5]
Percutaneous transpedicular polymethyl methacrylate vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures [J].
Amar, AP ;
Larsen, DW ;
Esnaashari, N ;
Albuquerque, FC ;
Lavine, SD ;
Teitelbaum, GP .
NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 49 (05) :1105-1114
[6]
[Anonymous], 2004, JMiner Stqffwechs
[7]
Kyphoplasty: 2 years of experience in a neurosurgery department [J].
Atalay, B ;
Caner, H ;
Gokce, C ;
Altinors, N .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 :72-76
[8]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization [J].
Barr, JD ;
Barr, MS ;
Lemley, TJ ;
McCann, RM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (08) :923-928
[9]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases:: Complications [J].
Barragán-Campos, HM ;
Vallée, JN ;
Lo, D ;
Cormier, E ;
Jean, B ;
Rose, M ;
Astagneau, P ;
Chiras, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) :354-362
[10]
Cement embolization into the vena cava and pulmonal arteries after vertebroplasty: Interdisciplinary management [J].
Baumann, A. ;
Tauss, J. ;
Baumann, G. ;
Tomka, M. ;
Hessinger, M. ;
Tiesenhausen, K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 31 (05) :558-561