Determinants and impacts of rural land market activity: Evidence from Nicaragua

被引:208
作者
Deininger, K
Zegarra, E
Lavadenz, I
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] Minist Agr, Lima, Peru
关键词
Central America; Nicaragua; land markets; poverty; productivity; agriculture;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00101-3
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 [理论经济学]; 020105 [世界经济]; 03 [法学]; 0303 [社会学];
摘要
Use of data from Nicaragua to examine the performance of land rental and sales markets during 1995-98 which coincide with the implementation of major macroeconomic and sectoral reforms leads to three main conclusions. First, even though the data point toward an inverse farm-size productivity relationship and large differences in land productivity between large and small producers, land markets have not led to an equalization of returns among the groups considered. Second. both in 1995 and in 1998, land sales markets have contributed to land concentration, suggesting that credit market imperfections impeded demand in land sales markets. Third, the policy reforms undertaken after 1995 have led to a structural shift in the performance of the land rental market instead of transferring land to large owners, as it did in 1995, the land market now moves land from large to small producers. The quantities involved however, remain limited. We conclude that, if it is to contribute to equity and efficiency, liberalization of land sales markets has to be complemented by measures to reduce the attractiveness of speculative land accumulation. Furthermore, measures to reduce the transaction costs of land rental (e.g., titling) and to increase effective demand from small producers (e.g., technical assistance and credit) will be needed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1404
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Alston L.J., 1999, EC COGNITION SOC SER
[2]
AGRO-EXPORT PRODUCTION AND PEASANT LAND ACCESS - EXAMINING THE DYNAMIC BETWEEN ADOPTION AND ACCUMULATION [J].
BARHAM, B ;
CARTER, MR ;
SIGELKO, W .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1995, 46 (01) :85-107
[3]
BAUMEISTER E, 1999, 105 UNRISD UNRSLO
[4]
Binswanger H. P., 1988, AGR GOVT INTERDEPEND
[5]
Binswanger H.P., 1995, Handbook of Development Economics, V3, P2659, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4471(95)30019-8
[6]
BROCKETT CD, 1998, LAND POWER POVERTY A
[7]
The dynamic cost and persistence of asset inequality in an agrarian economy [J].
Carter, MR ;
Zimmerman, FJ .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2000, 63 (02) :265-302
[8]
CAN LAND MARKET REFORM MITIGATE THE EXCLUSIONARY ASPECTS OF RAPID AGRO-EXPORT GROWTH [J].
CARTER, MR ;
MESBAH, D .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 21 (07) :1085-1100
[9]
Level playing fields and laissez faire: Postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies [J].
Carter, MR ;
Barham, BL .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 24 (07) :1133-1149
[10]
Rural nonfarm incomes in Nicaragua [J].
Corral, L ;
Reardon, T .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (03) :427-442