P300 and sleep-related positive waveforms (P220, P450, and P900) have different determinants

被引:29
作者
Hull, J [1 ]
Harsh, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Psychol, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
关键词
cognitive processing; ERPs; oddball task; P300; sleep onset;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2869.2001.00238.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Stimulus factors known to influence the amplitude of the well known endogenous event-related potential (ERP) component P300 were manipulated to determine whether they have the same: or a different, influence on the amplitude of positivities of the sleep ERPs identified as P220, P450, and P900. Behavioral responsiveness and ERPs were recorded as subjects moved from wakefulness to sleep while performing an oddball task. The task consisted of sequential presentation of target and non-target tone stimuli with instructions to respond to targets with a finger-lift response. The probability of the target and non-target stimuli was varied (0.2/0.8, 0.5/.05 and 0.8/0.2) across three test conditions. While subjects were awake, P300 was maximal parietally with amplitude inversely related to the relative probability of the evoking stimulus and directly related to its task relevance. Positive waveforms (P220, P450, P900) recorded in sleep were largest at frontal and central recording sites. P220 and P900 amplitudes were inversely related to stimulus probability. P220 was smaller following target relative to non-target stimuli. Processes underlying P220, P450, and P900 sleep-related waveforms are different from those underlying the P300 component seen in alert wakefulness. The sleep positivities may be state-related waveforms subject to modulation by psychological processes.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   THE EVOKED K-COMPLEX - ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON [J].
BASTIEN, C ;
CAMPBELL, K .
SLEEP, 1992, 15 (03) :236-245
[2]   BRAIN PROCESSING OF STIMULUS DEVIANCE DURING SLOW-WAVE AND PARADOXICAL SLEEP - A STUDY OF HUMAN AUDITORY-EVOKED RESPONSES USING THE ODDBALL PARADIGM [J].
BASTUJI, H ;
GARCIALARREA, L ;
FRANC, C ;
MAUGUIERE, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 12 (02) :155-167
[3]  
BASTUJI H, 1990, 10 C EUR SLEEP SOC, P379
[4]  
CAMPBELL K, 1992, SLEEP, AROUSAL, AND PERFORMANCE, P88
[5]   The effects of varying stimulus intensity on P300 during REM sleep [J].
Cote, KA ;
Campbell, KB .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (11) :2313-2318
[6]   P300 to high intensity stimuli during REM sleep [J].
Cote, KA ;
Campbell, KB .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (08) :1345-1350
[7]  
DONCHIN E, 1986, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY SYS, P244
[8]   QUANTIFYING SURPRISE - VARIATION OF EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS WITH SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
DUNCANJOHNSON, CC ;
DONCHIN, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 14 (05) :456-467
[9]   A NEW METHOD FOR OFF-LINE REMOVAL OF OCULAR ARTIFACT [J].
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 55 (04) :468-484
[10]   ERP AND BEHAVIORAL-CHANGES DURING THE WAKE SLEEP TRANSITION [J].
HARSH, J ;
VOSS, U ;
HULL, J ;
SCHREPFER, S ;
BADIA, P .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 31 (03) :244-252