Factors influencing cortical silent period:: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction

被引:121
作者
Saisanen, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Pirinen, Eriikka [1 ]
Teitti, Seja [1 ]
Kononen, Mervi [1 ,3 ]
Julkunen, Petro [1 ]
Maatta, Sara [1 ]
Karhu, Jari [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Kuopio, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Nexstim Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; navigated brain stimulation; motor cortex; motor evoked potential; silent period;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.12.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Inhibitory silent period (SP) is a transient suppression of voluntary muscle activity after depolarization of representative motor neuronal populations following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Our aim was to evaluate and present an optimal protocol for the measurement of SP by (1) determining the impact of muscle activation level and stimulus intensity (SI) on the duration of SP, and, (2) studying the relationship between motor evoked potential (MEP) and SP, using targeted stimulus delivery. Single magnetic pulses were focused on the optimal representation area of the thenar musculature on primary motor cortex. We utilized real-time 3D-positioning of TMS-evoked electric field on anatomical structures derived from individual MR-images. The SI varied from 80% to 120% of individual resting motor threshold (MT). Muscle activation levels varied from 20% to 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Contralateral SP lengthened significantly with increasing SI independent of target Muscle activation. The peak amplitude of the MEP was affected by SI and force. Latency and duration of the MEP were practically unaffected by SI or force. Focal stimulation at 110-120% MT and approximately 50% MVC (with only negligible need for control) provides most stable and informative SP. MEP should be included in SP as the error from marking the onset diminishes. This study provides a guideline for the consistent measurement of SP, which is applicable when using navigated or traditional TMS. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Awiszus F, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P13
[2]  
CANTELLO R, 1992, NEUROLOGY, V42, P1951
[3]   Mechanism of the silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation - Evidence from epidural recordings [J].
Chen, R ;
Lozano, AM ;
Ashby, P .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 128 (04) :539-542
[4]  
Cicinelli P, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P535, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199705)20:5<535::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-A
[6]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation [J].
Currà, A ;
Modugno, N ;
Inghilleri, M ;
Manfredi, M ;
Hallett, M ;
Berardelli, A .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (12) :1851-1859
[7]   Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization [J].
Elias, LJ ;
Bryden, MP ;
Bulman-Fleming, MB .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (01) :37-43
[8]   SPINAL MOTOR-NEURON EXCITABILITY DURING THE SILENT PERIOD AFTER CORTICAL STIMULATION [J].
FUHR, P ;
AGOSTINO, R ;
HALLETT, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (04) :257-262
[9]   New graphical method to measure silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Garvey, MA ;
Ziemann, U ;
Becker, DA ;
Barker, CA ;
Bartko, JJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (08) :1451-1460
[10]   Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex [J].
Hannula, H ;
Ylioja, S ;
Pertovaara, A ;
Korvenoja, A ;
Ruohonen, J ;
Ilmoniemi, RJ ;
Carlson, S .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2005, 26 (02) :100-109