In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning

被引:1232
作者
Evans, JST [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Ctr Thinking & Language, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Researchers in thinking and reasoning have proposed recently that there are two distinct cognitive systems underlying reasoning. System 1 is old in evolutionary terms and shared with other animals: it comprises a set of autonomous subsystems that include both innate input modules and domain-specific knowledge acquired by a domain-general learning mechanism. System 2 is evolutionarily recent and distinctively human: it permits abstract reasoning and hypothetical thinking, but is constrained by working memory capacity and correlated with measures of general intelligence. These theories essentially posit two minds in one brain with a range of experimental psychological evidence showing that the two systems compete for control of our inferences and actions.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 459
页数:6
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Almor A, 2003, CURR ISS THINK REASO, P101
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, IMPLICIT LEARNING TA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Reckoning with risk
[4]  
[Anonymous], THINK REASONING
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1966, PSYCHOL E BRUNSWIK
[6]   The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? [J].
Baddeley, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (11) :417-423
[7]  
Braine M. D. S., 1998, MENTAL LOGIC, DOI 10.4324/9781410603005
[8]   Working memory and reasoning: An individual differences perspective [J].
Capon, A ;
Handley, S ;
Dennis, I .
THINKING & REASONING, 2003, 9 (03) :203-244
[9]  
Chen S, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P73
[10]   Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty [J].
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (01) :1-73