Meta-paradigm change and the theory of the firm

被引:18
作者
Nightingale, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Freeman Ctr, SPRU, Brighton BN1 9QE, E Sussex, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/icc/dtn016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many seemingly unrelated debates on the theory of the firm are in fact part of a single, deeper transformation of the social sciences. As the foundational assumptions of 20th century social science have slowly been shown by science to be false, new sub-paradigms have emerged, which cumulatively drop (i) theoretical assumptions about markets to explain firms; (ii) epistemological assumptions about knowledge to explain diversity; and (iii) metaphysical assumptions about causality to explain technical change. Debates occur across each of these levels.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 583
页数:51
相关论文
共 261 条
[1]   SOME IMPLICATIONS OF GROWTH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL FORM AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE [J].
AGHION, P ;
TIROLE, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 39 (3-4) :440-455
[2]  
AGHION P, 1990, J POLITICAL EC, V58, P1041
[3]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[4]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1929, EC WELFARE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Industrial and Corporate Change, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/5.3.653
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1961, The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1963, CONJECTURE REFUTATIO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1983, LAWS PHYS LIE, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198247044.001.0001
[10]  
[Anonymous], ADAPTIVE EC MODELS