Minimal model-based insulin sensitivity has greater heritability and a different genetic basis than homeostasis model assessment or fasting insulin

被引:81
作者
Bergman, RN
Zaccaro, DJ
Watanabe, RM
Haffner, SM
Saad, MF
Norris, JM
Wagenknecht, LE
Hokanson, JE
Rotter, JI
Rich, SS
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Ctr Hlth Sci, Denver, CO USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diabetes.52.8.2168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Insulin resistance is an important risk factor for development of type 2 diabetes as well as. other chronic conditions, including hypertension cardiovascular disease, and colon cancer. To find genes for insulin resistance it is necessary to assess insulin action in large populations. We have previously measured insulin action in a large cohort of subjects (Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis Study [IRAS] Family Study) using the minimal model approach. In this study, we compare sensitivity from the minimal model (insulin sensitivity index [S-I]) with the measure of insulin resistance emanating from the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) approach. The former measure emerges from the glycemic response to endogenous and exogenous insulin; the latter is based solely on fasting measures of glucose and insulin. A total of 112 pedigrees Were represented, including 1,362 individuals with full phenotypic assessment. Heritability of S, was significantly greater than that for HOMA (0.310 vs. 0.163) and for fasting insulin (0.171), adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI. In addition, correlation between S-I and either HOMA or fasting insulin was only similar to50% accounted for by genetic factors, with the remainder accounted for by environment. Thus S-I, a direct measure of insulin sensitivity, is determined more by genetic factors rather than measures such as HOMA, which reflect fasting insulin.
引用
收藏
页码:2168 / 2174
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees [J].
Almasy, L ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (05) :1198-1211
[2]  
AMOS CI, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V54, P535
[3]  
Balent B, 2002, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V967, P535
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY INVIVO - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
HOPE, ID ;
YANG, YJ ;
WATANABE, RM ;
MEADOR, MA ;
YOUN, JH ;
ADER, M .
DIABETES-METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1989, 5 (05) :411-429
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY INVIVO [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
FINEGOOD, DT ;
ADER, M .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1985, 6 (01) :45-86
[6]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
IDER, YZ ;
BOWDEN, CR ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06) :E667-E677
[7]   TOWARD PHYSIOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE - MINIMAL-MODEL APPROACH [J].
BERGMAN, RN .
DIABETES, 1989, 38 (12) :1512-1527
[8]   EQUIVALENCE OF THE INSULIN SENSITIVITY INDEX IN MAN DERIVED BY THE MINIMAL MODEL METHOD AND THE EUGLYCEMIC GLUCOSE CLAMP [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
PRAGER, R ;
VOLUND, A ;
OLEFSKY, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1987, 79 (03) :790-800
[9]  
Bogardus C, 2002, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V967, P1
[10]   Preservation of pancreatic β-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk Hispanic women [J].
Buchanan, TA ;
Xiang, AH ;
Peters, RK ;
Kjos, SL ;
Marroquin, A ;
Goico, J ;
Ochoa, C ;
Tan, S ;
Berkowitz, K ;
Hodis, HN ;
Azen, SP .
DIABETES, 2002, 51 (09) :2796-2803