Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases

被引:315
作者
Marshall, Michael S. [1 ]
Burns, Lori A. [1 ]
Sherrill, C. David [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biochem, Ctr Computat Mol Sci & Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
benchmark testing; coupled cluster calculations; hydrogen bonds; molecular configurations; perturbation theory; PI-PI INTERACTIONS; POTENTIAL-ENERGY SURFACE; LIMIT INTERACTION ENERGIES; CCSD(T) CORRECTION TERM; T-SHAPED INTERACTIONS; AB-INITIO LIMIT; BENZENE DIMER; BINDING-ENERGIES; CYTOSINE DIMER; MOLLER-PLESSET;
D O I
10.1063/1.3659142
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In benchmark-quality studies of non-covalent interactions, it is common to estimate interaction energies at the complete basis set (CBS) coupled-cluster through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level of theory by adding to CBS second-order perturbation theory (MP2) a "coupled-cluster correction," delta(CCSD(T))(MP2), evaluated in a modest basis set. This work illustrates that commonly used basis sets such as 6-31G*(0.25) can yield large, even wrongly signed, errors for delta(CCSD(T))(MP2) that vary significantly by binding motif. Double-zeta basis sets show more reliable results when used with explicitly correlated methods to form a delta(CCSD(T*)(MP2-F12))-F12 correction, yielding a mean absolute deviation of 0.11 kcal mol-1 for the S22 test set. Examining the coupled-cluster correction for basis sets up to sextuple-zeta in quality reveals that delta(CCSD(T))(MP2) converges monotonically only beyond a turning point at triple-zeta or quadruple-zeta quality. In consequence, CBS extrapolation of delta(CCSD(T))(MP2) corrections before the turning point, generally CBS (aug-cc-pVDZ,aug-cc-pVTZ), are found to be unreliable and often inferior to aug-cc-pVTZ alone, especially for hydrogen-bonding systems. Using the findings of this paper, we revise some recent benchmarks for non-covalent interactions, namely the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG test sets. The maximum differences in the revised benchmarks are 0.080, 0.060, 0.257, and 0.102 kcal mol(-1), respectively. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3659142]
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   A simple and efficient CCSD(T)-F12 approximation [J].
Adler, Thomas B. ;
Knizia, Gerald ;
Werner, Hans-Joachim .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 127 (22)
[2]   Definition of the hydrogen bond (IUPAC Recommendations 2011) [J].
Arunan, Elangannan ;
Desiraju, Gautam R. ;
Klein, Roger A. ;
Sadlej, Joanna ;
Scheiner, Steve ;
Alkorta, Ibon ;
Clary, David C. ;
Crabtree, Robert H. ;
Dannenberg, Joseph J. ;
Hobza, Pavel ;
Kjaergaard, Henrik G. ;
Legon, Anthony C. ;
Mennucci, Benedetta ;
Nesbitt, David J. .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2011, 83 (08) :1637-1641
[3]   Basis set limit coupled cluster study of h-bonded systems and assessment of more approximate methods [J].
Boese, A. Daniel ;
Martin, Jan M. L. ;
Klopper, Wim .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2007, 111 (43) :11122-11133
[4]   CALCULATION OF SMALL MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BY DIFFERENCES OF SEPARATE TOTAL ENERGIES - SOME PROCEDURES WITH REDUCED ERRORS [J].
BOYS, SF ;
BERNARDI, F .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1970, 19 (04) :553-&
[5]   Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: A comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals [J].
Burns, Lori A. ;
Vazquez-Mayagoitia, Alvaro ;
Sumpter, Bobby G. ;
Sherrill, C. David .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 134 (08)
[6]   In pursuit of the ab initio limit for conformational energy prototypes [J].
Császár, AG ;
Allen, WD ;
Schaefer, HF .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 108 (23) :9751-9764
[7]   Stabilization energies of the hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of nucleic acid base pairs in the crystal geometries of CG, AT, and AC DNA steps and in the NMR geometry of the 5′-d(GCGAAGC)-3′ hairpin:: Complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels [J].
Dabkowska, I ;
Gonzalez, HV ;
Jurecka, P ;
Hobza, P .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2005, 109 (06) :1131-1136
[8]   THE HEAT OF FORMATION OF NCO [J].
EAST, ALL ;
ALLEN, WD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 99 (06) :4638-4650
[9]   Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-Ligand Complexes [J].
Faver, John C. ;
Benson, Mark L. ;
He, Xiao ;
Roberts, Benjamin P. ;
Wang, Bing ;
Marshall, Michael S. ;
Kennedy, Matthew R. ;
Sherrill, C. David ;
Merz, Kenneth M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2011, 7 (03) :790-797
[10]   An efficient algorithm for the density-functional theory treatment of dispersion interactions [J].
Grafenstein, Jurgen ;
Cremer, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 130 (12)