Effects of swathing on yield and quality of spring canola in northern Idaho

被引:22
作者
Brown, J [1 ]
Davis, JB [1 ]
Erickson, DA [1 ]
Brown, AP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Plant Soil & Entomol Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE | 1999年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jpa1999.033
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Spring canola (Brassica napus L.) is a new crop in the Pacific Northwest and growers have adopted cultural practices used in western Canada where spring canola (or rapeseed) must be swathed to hasten maturity and avoid frost damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preharvest swathing on the seed yield and seed quality, and determine the best time to swath in northern Idaho, if swathing is needed. Five spring canola cultivars were planted in 1992 and 1993 to compare seed yield and quality of swathed and direct harvest crops. In 1994, commercial agricultural machinery was used in larger plots, to compare seed yield and quality from three different swathing dates with direct harvest. In 1992, directly harvested canola had higher yields than swathed canola. The following year, yield of directly harvested and swathed canola were not different. in commercial scale trials, yield loss was linearly related to time of swathing with the least reduction occurring when swathed at 60 to 80% brown seed, and most yield loss occurring when swathed at 10 to 20% brown seed. Therefore, optimal swathing time would be when most seeds were brown. Swathing canola resulted in smaller seed and greater chlorophyll content. However, swathed crops had lower seed moisture content, which may ease harvest operations. We recommend that canola should only be swathed in northern Idaho in cool and wet growing seasons, where harvest is delayed.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 37
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-84023-4_
[2]   EFFECT OF HARVEST DATE AND SWATHING OF MOISTURE-CONTENT AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT OF CANOLA SEED [J].
CENKOWSKI, S ;
SOKHANSANJ, S ;
SOSULSKI, FW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1989, 69 (03) :925-928
[3]   POTENTIAL OF IN-FIELD AND LOW-TEMPERATURE DRYING FOR REDUCING CHLOROPHYLL CONTENTS IN CANOLA (BRASSICA-NAPUS L) [J].
CENKOWSKI, S ;
JAYAS, DS ;
DAUN, JK .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1993, 63 (04) :377-383
[4]  
Christie W.W., 1992, INFORM, V3, P1031
[5]  
*PAC NW RAP CAN AS, 1996, NEWSL 1996 SUMM
[6]  
POWELL GR, 1994, P PAC NW CAN C SPOK, P27
[7]  
Raymer P.L., 1990, CANOLA RAPESEED PROD, P25
[8]   INFLUENCE OF TIMING AND METHOD OF HARVEST ON RAPESEED YIELD [J].
THOMAS, DL ;
BREVE, MA ;
RAYMER, PL .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (02) :266-272
[9]  
THOMAS P, 1984, CANOLA GROWERS MANUA
[10]  
United States Department of Agriculture USDA, 1997, GRAIN INSP HDB, P1