Exploring Motivations for Online Privacy Protection Behavior: Insights From Panel Data

被引:136
作者
Boerman, Sophie C. [1 ]
Kruikemeier, Sanne [2 ]
Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Persuas Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, Polit Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat Law IViR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
privacy; protective behavior; protection motivation theory; cookies; ad blockers; Internet; computer-mediated communication; survey; panel data; SELF-DISCLOSURE; FEAR APPEALS; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE; GENDER; SEALS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0093650218800915
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Personally managing and protecting online privacy has become an essential part of everyday life. This research draws on the protection motivation theory (PMT) to investigate privacy protective behavior online. A two-wave panel study (N = 928) shows that (1) people rarely to occasionally protect their online privacy and (2) people most often delete cookies and browser history or decline cookies to protect their online privacy. In addition, (3) the perceived threat is high: People perceive the collection, usage, and sharing of personal information as a severe problem to which they are susceptible. The coping appraisal is mixed: Although people do have confidence in some protective measures, they have little confidence in their own efficacy to protect their online privacy. Moreover, privacy protective behavior is affected by perceived severity and response efficacy. These findings emphasize the relevance of the PMT in the context of privacy threats, and have important implications for regulators.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 977
页数:25
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] The Web Never Forgets: Persistent Tracking Mechanisms in the Wild
    Acar, Gunes
    Eubank, Christian
    Englehardt, Steven
    Juarez, Marc
    Narayanan, Arvind
    Diaz, Claudia
    [J]. CCS'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, 2014, : 674 - 689
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, DOI [10.5817/CP2012-1-3, DOI 10.5817/CP2012-1-3]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Adnostic: Privacy preserving targeted advertising *
  • [4] Balebako Rebecca, 2012, Measuring the effectiveness of privacy tools for limiting behavioral advertising. Web 2.0 Security Privacy 2012
  • [5] Bandura A., 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P191, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191]
  • [6] Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review
    Baruh, Lemi
    Secinti, Ekin
    Cemalcilar, Zeynep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2017, 67 (01) : 26 - 53
  • [7] Big data analytics and the limits of privacy self-management
    Baruh, Lemi
    Popescu, Mihaela
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2017, 19 (04) : 579 - 596
  • [8] Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
    Boerman, Sophie C.
    Kruikemeier, Sanne
    Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (03) : 363 - 376
  • [9] Borgesius Fredrik Zuiderveen, 2017, An Assessment of the Commission's Proposal on Privacy and Electronic Communications
  • [10] Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet
    Buchanan, Tom
    Paine, Carina
    Joinson, Adam N.
    Reips, Ulf-Dietrich
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (02): : 157 - 165