Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses

被引:156
作者
Traxler, MJ
Williams, RS
Blozis, SA
Morris, RK
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
sentence processing; syntax; working memory; relative clause; animacy; semantics;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In three eye-movement monitoring experiments, participants' working memory capacity was assessed and they read sentences containing subject-extracted and object-extracted relative clauses, In Experiment 1, sentences lacked helpful semantic cues, object-relatives were harder to process than subject relatives, and working memory capacity did not moderate syntactic complexity effects. In Experiments 2 and 3, categorical distinctions between critical nouns provided helpful semantic cues to syntactic structure and interpretation. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that helpful semantic cues reduced or eliminated syntactic complexity effects, and that this reduction was not produced by lexical properties of specific verbs. Further, in Experiment 2 working memory capacity moderated the interaction of syntactic complexity and semantic cues. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 224
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Baddeley A., 1974, PSYCHOL LEARNING MOT, V8
[2]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[3]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806
[4]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[5]   APHASIC DISORDERS OF SYNTACTIC COMPREHENSION AND WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY [J].
CAPLAN, D ;
WATERS, GS .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 12 (06) :637-649
[6]  
CAPLAN D, 1990, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL I
[7]  
Chomsky N., 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding: the Pisan Lectures, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110884166
[8]  
CLIFTON C, 2003, USE THEMATIC ROLE IN
[9]   Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis [J].
Daneman, M ;
Merikle, PM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (04) :422-433
[10]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466