Differences in electrical stimulation thresholds between men and women

被引:78
作者
Maffiuletti, Nicola A. [1 ]
Herrero, Azael J. [2 ]
Jubeau, Marc [3 ]
Impellizzeri, Franco M. [1 ]
Bizzini, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Schulthess Clin, Neuromuscular Res Lab, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] European Univ Miguel Cervantes, Fac Hlth Sci, Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ Burgundy, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med, U887, Dijon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ana.21346
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Surface electrical stimulation (ES) of skeletal muscle is used in a variety of clinical settings in healthy and unhealthy subjects of both sexes. Although women generally present larger amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue than men, which could limit current flow to the stimulated muscle, sex-related differences in ES current levels have not been clearly demonstrated to date. We report data from healthy men and wom Methods: Sensory (current perception), motor (minimal knee extension torque production), and supramotor thresholds (10% of the maximal voluntary knee extension torque) and perceived pain during surface ES of the quadriceps femoris muscle were investigated in 40 healthy volunteers (20 men, 20 women). Results: Sensory threshold was lower in women than in men (-43%; p < 0.001). Similarly, female muscles required lower current amplitudes to attain the supramotor threshold (-17%; p < 0.01). The Visual Analogue Scale pain score was significantly greater in women than in men at motor threshold (+112%; p < 0.01) but not at supramotor threshold (+36%; p > 0.05). Interpretation: Collectively, our data demonstrate higher sensory and supramotor excitability to surface ES in female subjects and provide further evidence for a neurophysiological explanation for more pronounced pain perception in women. These observations may help clinicians to better understand the sex-specific response to ES and to design more rational stimulation treatments with the ultimate goal of optimizing patient care and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Alon G, 2005, J SPORT SCI MED, V4, P395
[2]
Selective activation of AMPK-PGC-1α or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation [J].
Atherton, PJ ;
Babraj, JA ;
Smith, K ;
Singh, J ;
Rennie, MJ ;
Wackerhage, H .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2005, 19 (02) :786-+
[3]
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Bax, L ;
Staes, F ;
Verhagen, A .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (03) :191-212
[4]
Bergman BC, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P1
[5]
Collins DF, 2007, EXERC SPORT SCI REV, V35, P102
[6]
RELATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE FIBER SIZE AND SENSATION IN MAN [J].
COLLINS, WF ;
NULSEN, FE ;
RANDT, CT .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1960, 3 (OCT) :381-385
[7]
Comparison of low-frequency electrical myostimulation and conventional aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure [J].
Deley, G ;
Kervio, G ;
Verges, B ;
Hannequin, A ;
Petitdant, MF ;
Salmi-Belmihoub, S ;
Grassi, B ;
Casillas, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2005, 12 (03) :226-233
[8]
DEVAHL J, 1992, ELECTROTHERAPY REHAB, P218
[9]
DIVINCENTI FC, 1969, J TRAUM, V9, P497
[10]
STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381