On the accurate counting of tumor cells

被引:28
作者
Fang, B [1 ]
Hsu, W
Lee, ML
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore MIT Alliance, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Comp, Dept Comp Sci, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
dynamic water immersion; features mining; local adaptive thresholding; tumor cell identification;
D O I
10.1109/TNB.2003.813930
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Quantitative analysis of tumor cells is fundamental to pathological studies. Current practices are mostly manual, time-consuming, and tedious, yielding subjective and imprecise results. To understand the behavior of tumor cells, it is critical to have an objective way to count these cells. In addition, these counts must be reproducible and independent of the person performing the count. In this work, we propose a two-stage tumor cell identification strategy. In the first stage, potential tumor cells are segmented automatically using local adaptive thresholding and dynamic water immersion techniques. Unfortunately, due to histological noise in the images, a large number of false identifications are obtained. To improve the accuracy of the identified tumor cells, a second stage of feature rules mining is initiated. Experiment results show that image processing techniques alone are unable to give accurate results for tumor cell counting. However, with the use of features rules, we are able to achieve an identification accuracy of 94.3%.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   SEEDED REGION GROWING [J].
ADAMS, R ;
BISCHOF, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1994, 16 (06) :641-647
[2]  
Anoraganingrum D., 1999, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, P1043, DOI 10.1109/ICIAP.1999.797734
[3]  
ANTONIE ML, 2001, 2 INT WORKSH MULT DA, P94
[4]  
Awasthi V., 1994, Bioimaging, V2, P98, DOI 10.1002/1361-6374(199406)2:2<98::AID-BIO4>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-X
[6]   COMPUTER-BASED TRACKING OF LIVING CELLS [J].
BERNS, GS ;
BERNS, MW .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1982, 142 (01) :103-109
[7]  
Bernsen J., PROC INT CONF PATT R, P1251
[8]  
CANNY JF, 1986, PAMI, V8, P6, DOI DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851
[9]   Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis [J].
Chan, KL ;
Lee, TW ;
Sample, P ;
Goldbaum, MH ;
Weinreb, RN ;
Sejnowski, ATJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 49 (09) :963-974
[10]  
CHEN YM, 1999, P IEEE BMES EMBS, V2, P819