Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: Oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer

被引:242
作者
Slavin, SA
Schnitt, SJ
Duda, RB
Houlihan, MJ
Koufman, CN
Morris, DJ
Troyan, SL
Goldwyn, RM
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-199807000-00008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Skin-sparing mastectomy has been advocated as an oncologically safe approach for the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer that minimizes deformity and improves cosmesis through preservation of the skin envelope of the breast. Because chest wall skin is the most frequent site of local failure after mastectomy, concerns have been raised that inadequate skill excision could result in an increased risk of local recurrence. Precise borders of the skin resection have not been well established, and long-term local recurrence rates after skin-sparing mastectomy are not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the oncologic safety and aesthetic results for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and saline breast prosthesis. Fifty-one patients with early-stage breast cancer (26 with ductal carcinoma in situ and 25 with invasive carcinoma) undergoing primary mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a latissimus flap were studied from 1991 through 1994. For 32 consecutive patients, skin-sparing mastectomy was defined as a 5-mm margin of skin designed around the border of the nipple-areolar complex. After the mastectomy, biopsies were obtained from the remaining native skin flap edges. Patients were followed for 44.8 months. Histologic examination of 114 native skin flap biopsy specimens failed to demonstrate breast ducts in the dermis of any of the 32 consecutive patients studied. One of 26 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ had metastases to the skin of the lateral chest wall and back. Four other patients, one with stage I disease and three with stage II-B disease, had recurrent breast carcinoma. The stage I patient had a local recurrence in the subcutaneous tissues near the mastectomy specimen. Two patients suffered axillary relapse, and one had distant metastases to the The findings of this study support the technique of skin-sparing mastectomy as an oncologically safe one, axillary relapse, and one had distant metastases to the spine. The findings of this study support the technique of skin-sparing mastectomy as an oncologically safe one, based on an absence of breast ductal epithelium at the margins of the native skin flaps and a local recurrence rate of 2 percent after 45 months of follow-up. Although these results need to be confirmed with greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up, skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction may be considered an excellent alternative treatment to breast conservation for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 62
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AUCHINCLOSS H, 1958, CANCER, V11, P611, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195805/06)11:3<611::AID-CNCR2820110323>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-B
[3]   GLANDULAR EXCISION IN TOTAL GLANDULAR MASTECTOMY AND MODIFIED RADICAL-MASTECTOMY - A COMPARISON [J].
BARTON, FE ;
ENGLISH, JM ;
KINGSLEY, WB ;
FIETZ, M .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 88 (03) :389-392
[4]   IMPROVED AESTHETICS IN BREAST RECONSTRUCTION - MODIFIED MASTECTOMY INCISION AND IMMEDIATE AUTOLOGOUS TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION [J].
BENSIMON, RH ;
BERGMEYER, JM .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1995, 34 (03) :229-235
[5]   60 LATISSIMUS-DORSI FLAPS [J].
BOSTWICK, J ;
NAHAI, F ;
WALLACE, JG ;
VASCONEZ, LO .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1979, 63 (01) :31-41
[6]  
Carlson GW, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P151
[7]   Preservation of the inframammary fold: What are we leaving behind? [J].
Carlson, GW ;
Grossl, N ;
Lewis, MM ;
Temple, JR ;
Styblo, TM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 98 (03) :447-450
[8]  
CONWAY H, 1949, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V88, P45
[9]  
DINNER MI, 1993, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V176, P82
[10]  
DONEGAN WL, 1966, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V122, P529