Comparison of ice-affected streamflow estimates computed using artificial neural networks and multiple regression techniques

被引:58
作者
Chokmani, Karem [1 ]
Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. [1 ]
Hamilton, Stuart [2 ]
Ghedira, M. Hosni [3 ]
Gingras, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Canada Res Chair Estimat Hydrol Variables, Hydro Quebec NSEC Chair Stat Hydrol, INRS ETE, Quebec City, PQ G15 9A9, Canada
[2] Environm Canada, Vancouver, BC V6C 365, Canada
[3] CUNY City Coll, Dept Civil Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
river discharge; streamflow under ice; river ice; artificial neural networks; multiple regression;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.024
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to test and compare artificial neural network (ANN) and regression models for estimating river streamflow affected by ice conditions. Three regression models are investigated including: multiple regression, stepwise regression and ridge regression. A case study conducted on the Fraser River in British Columbia (Canada) is presented in which various combinations of hydrological and meteorological explanatory variables were used. Discharge estimates obtained by statistical modeling were also compared to the official estimates made by Water Survey of Canada (WSC) hydrometric technologists. The case study shows that ANN models are relatively more successful than regression models for winter streamflow estimation purposes. However, due to data scarcity, it was difficult to make a definitive assessment. Stepwise regression was found to be the most effective of the three regressive approaches investigated. Statistical modeling is a viable approach for winter streamflow data estimation, but data completeness and reliability is a major limitation. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 396
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models [J].
Anctil, F ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (04) :357-368
[2]   Improvement of rainfall-runoff forecasts through mean areal rainfall optimization [J].
Anctil, Francois ;
Lauzon, Nicolas ;
Andreassian, Vazken ;
Oudin, Ludovic ;
Perrin, Charles .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 328 (3-4) :717-725
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Applied Linear Regression Models
[4]   Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1 - background and methodology [J].
Bowden, GJ ;
Dandy, GC ;
Maier, HR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 301 (1-4) :75-92
[5]   Hydrological forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Bobée, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1999, 26 (03) :293-304
[6]   Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks [J].
Dawson, CW ;
Wilby, RL .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 25 (01) :80-108
[7]  
Draper NR., 1966, APPL REGRESSION ANAL
[8]   RUNOFF FORECASTING USING RBF NETWORKS WITH OLS ALGORITHM [J].
Fernando, D. Achela K. ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 1998, 3 (03) :203-209
[9]  
FONTAINE RA, 1983, 834025 USGS
[10]   RAINFALL FORECASTING IN SPACE AND TIME USING A NEURAL NETWORK [J].
FRENCH, MN ;
KRAJEWSKI, WF ;
CUYKENDALL, RR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1992, 137 (1-4) :1-31