Comparison of itraconazole and ketoconazole in HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis

The efficacy of oral itraconazole and ketoconazole in the treatment of oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis, and the rate of post-treatment relapse, were compared in a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized. parallel-group trial. A total of 143 adult HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis were assigned to receive either itraconazole or ketoconazole (200 mg/day). Patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis were treated for 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. Patients were evaluated clinically and mycologically after 1, 2 and 4 (for esophageal patients) weeks of therapy, and relapses were compared in a 6-week post-treatment follow-up period. Of 129 evaluable patients. 98 had oropharyngeal candidiasis and 31 esophageal infection. CDC classification, CD4+ cell counts, and number of precious episodes of oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis were comparable in both groups. Oropharyngeal infection was cleared clinically at 21 days in 71% of patients receiving itraconazole and 60% receiving ketoconazole. and esophageal candidiasis was cleared at 41 days in 100% of patients receiving itraconazole and 91% receiving ketoconazole. Marginally significant differences were found between itraconazole and ketoconazole in rates of clearing of infection clinically in patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis (p = 0.0614 and 0.0781, respectively). Mean rates of infection relapse were not statistically different in the two treatment groups. Adverse events were generally mild and not considered drug related. Itraconazole is marginally more efficacious than ketoconazole in the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients and both drugs appear safe and well tolerated.