Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

被引:80
作者
Bretlau, L. G. [1 ]
Lunde, M. [1 ]
Lindberg, L. [1 ]
Unden, M. [1 ]
Dissing, S. [2 ]
Bech, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Panum Inst, Dept Cellular & Mol Med, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-993210
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The role of high-frequency rTMS over the left cortex as an add-on strategy in the treatment of major depression is still uncertain even in patients resistant to pharmacotherapy. We had planned a large sham TMS controlled study in the acute phase with a placebo-controlled relapse-prevention phase with escitalopram. However, because a recent meta-analysis showed only a small effect size of rTMS over sham TMS in the acute treatment phase of depressed patients, we decided to make an interim analysis. Method: In patients with medication-resistant major depression we administered in a randomised trial 15 sessions of sham-controlled rTMS over three weeks in combination with 20 mg escitalopram daily. After the last rTMS, the patients were followed for another 9 weeks on 20mg escitalopram daily. The antidepressant effect was measured by the HAM-D-6 as primary outcome scale. Results: A total of 45 patients with complete data were randomised so that 23 patients received sham TMS and 22 patients received active, high-frequency rTMS over the left cortex. Over the 3 weeks, the active rTMS treatment was superior to sham TMS with effect sizes on the HAM-D-6 above 0.70, which indicates not only a statistically but also a clinically significant effect. The patients had typically been through two failed antidepressant treatment attempts with non-tricyclics before inclusion in the study. Both the rTMS and escitalopram were well-tolerated. Conclusion: High-frequency rTMS over the left cortex is an add-on strategy of clinical significance in combination with escitalopram in patients with major depression resistant to nontricyclic antidepressants.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY
  • [2] INTERIM ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    ARMITAGE, P
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (06) : 925 - 937
  • [3] A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depression
    Avery, DH
    Holtzheimer, PE
    Fawaz, W
    Russo, J
    Neumaier, J
    Dunner, DL
    Haynor, DR
    Claypoole, KH
    Wajdik, C
    Roy-Byrne, P
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 59 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [4] The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight?
    Bagby, RM
    Ryder, AG
    Schuller, DR
    Marshall, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) : 2163 - 2177
  • [5] Dose-response relationship of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials
    Bech, P.
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2007, 40 (04) : 163 - 168
  • [6] Effective dose of escitalopram in moderate versus severe DSM-IV major depression
    Bech, P.
    Andersen, H. F.
    Wade, A.
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2006, 39 (04) : 128 - 134
  • [7] BECH P, 1986, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V73, P1
  • [8] The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity
    Bech, P
    Rasmussen, NA
    Olsen, LR
    Noerholm, V
    Abildgaard, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 66 (2-3) : 159 - 164
  • [9] Bech P., 1993, RATING SCALES PSYCHO
  • [10] Bechevet B., 2002, Transactions of the Magnetics Society of Japan, V2, P126, DOI 10.3379/tmjpn2001.2.126