Injection and compression molding of polystyrene/high-density polyethylene blends - Phase morphology and tensile behavior

被引:45
作者
Bureau, MN [1 ]
ElKadi, H [1 ]
Denault, J [1 ]
Dickson, JI [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL RES COUNCIL CANADA,INST IND MAT,BOUCHERVILLE,PQ J4B 6Y4,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pen.11680
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Processing and compatibilization effects on the phase morphology and the tensile behavior of blends of polystyrene and high-density polyethylene (PS/HDPE) were investigated. As predicted by theory, high shear rates encountered during extrusion blending led to efficient minor phase emulsification in immiscible PS/HDPE blends for which the viscosity ratio approaches unity. Consequently, the emulsifying effect of a styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene (SEBS) compatibilizer was found to be negligible. In the subsequent molding process, disintegration, shape relaxation and coarsening of the minor phase domains were found to be responsible for the morphological evolution. In the compression molding process, morphological observations showed that the rate of minor phase coarsening followed the predictions of the Ostwald ripening theory, in agreement with the rheological analysis. In the injection molding process, minor phase coarsening was attributed to shear coalescence. Tensile tests performed on compression molded and injection molded blends showed that the mechanical behavior of PS/HDPE blends depend strongly upon the matrix orientation as well as the dispersed phase morphology and orientation. In both postforming operations, compatibilization effects on the morphological stability and the tensile behavior of PS/HDPE blends were found to be dependent upon the composition and the rheological behavior of the blend. Evidence of adhesion between the PS and HDPE phases was observed in the presence of SEBS in HDPE-rich blends.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 390
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, POLYM ALLOYS BLENDS
[2]   COMPATABILISATION OF POLYSTYRENE-POLYOLEFIN BLENDS - IMPACT PROPERTIES [J].
APPLEBY, T ;
CSER, F ;
MOAD, G ;
RIZZARDO, E ;
STAVROPOULOS, C .
POLYMER BULLETIN, 1994, 32 (04) :479-485
[3]   MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYSTYRENE LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE BLENDS [J].
BARENTSEN, WM ;
HEIKENS, D .
POLYMER, 1973, 14 (11) :579-583
[4]  
BOUSMINA M, 1994, COMPOS INTERFACE, V2, P171
[5]  
BRIGHT PF, 1981, PLASTICS RUBBER PROC, V1, P139
[6]  
Bucknall CB., 1977, TOUGHNED PLASTICS, DOI [DOI 10.1002/POL.1978.130160714, 10.1007/978-94-017-5349-4, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-5349-4]
[7]  
Bureau MN, 1996, SOC PLAST E, V42, P2220
[8]   COARSENING IN POLYETHYLENE COPOLYMER BLENDS [J].
CRIST, B ;
NESARIKAR, AR .
MACROMOLECULES, 1995, 28 (04) :890-896
[9]   ROLE OF MORPHOLOGY AND COUPLING AGENT IN FRACTURE PERFORMANCE OF GLASS-FILLED POLYPROPYLENE [J].
DENAULT, J ;
VUKHANH, T .
POLYMER COMPOSITES, 1988, 9 (05) :360-367
[10]  
ELKADI H, 1995, SPE ANTEC TECH PAPER, V41, P3143