The Effect of Prophylactic Medications on TMS for Migraine Aura

被引:11
作者
Almaraz, Amy C. [1 ]
Dilli, Esma [2 ]
Dodick, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[2] Univ British Columbia Neurol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
HEADACHE | 2010年 / 50卷 / 10期
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; migraine; aura; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRIPTANS SEROTONIN; 5-HT1B/1D AGONISTS; METAANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01787.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Purpose.- Low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has recently been shown to be effective for the acute treatment of migraine with aura. TMS has recently been shown to inhibit cortical spreading depression (CSD). Prophylactic medications (PM) may reduce the frequency of migraine attacks by elevating CSD threshold. The interaction between PM and TMS is unknown. Methods.- Subgroup analysis was performed on a double-blind, Sham-controlled study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of TMS for the acute treatment of migraine with aura. Analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint pain-free at 2 hours (pain-free rate [PFR]) between TMS and Sham groups was performed based on the non-randomized use of PM. Results.- A total of 164 subjects eligibly treated at least 1 migraine with aura attack with TMS (n = 82) or Sham stimulation (n = 82). Baseline pain intensity at the time of treatment for the first attack was no pain (31%), mild (40%), moderate (23%), or severe pain (6%). PM were used by 37% (31/82) and 41.5% (34/82) in the Sham- and TMS-treated patients, respectively. Sham patients on no PM (Sham without) had significantly higher PFR than Sham-treated patients on PM (Sham with) (P = .0014). There was no difference in PFR between TMS-treated patients on (TMS with) or off (TMS without) PM (P = .5513). However, TMS with had significantly higher PFR than Sham with patients (P = .002). There was no difference in PFR between TMS without and Sham without patients (P = .4061). Conclusion.- Prophylactic medications do not appear to influence the treatment response to TMS. The better response in Sham-treated patients not on PM may indicate a more responsive subgroup or different patient phenotype than those currently using PM. These findings will need to be verified in a larger patient sample randomized by presence or absence of PM.
引用
收藏
页码:1630 / 1633
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Neurophysiological applications and safety [J].
Anand, S ;
Hotson, J .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 50 (03) :366-386
[2]
Suppression of cortical spreading depression in migraine prophylaxis [J].
Ayata, C ;
Jin, HW ;
Kudo, C ;
Dalkara, T ;
Moskowitz, MA .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 59 (04) :652-661
[3]
Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model [J].
Bolay, H ;
Reuter, U ;
Dunn, AK ;
Huang, ZH ;
Boas, DA ;
Moskowitz, MA .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (02) :136-142
[4]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for migraine: Clinical effects [J].
Clarke B.M. ;
Upton A.R.M. ;
Kamath M.V. ;
Al-Harbi T. ;
Castellanos C.M. .
The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2006, 7 (5) :341-346
[5]
Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine:: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials [J].
Ferrari, MD ;
Goadsby, PJ ;
Roon, KI ;
Lipton, RB .
CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (08) :633-658
[6]
Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in acute migraine treatment:: a meta-analysis of 53 trials [J].
Ferrari, MD ;
Roon, KI ;
Lipton, RB ;
Goadsby, PJ .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9294) :1668-1675
[7]
Drug therapy: Migraine - Current understanding and treatment. [J].
Goadsby, PJ ;
Lipton, RB ;
Ferrari, MD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (04) :257-270
[8]
HOLLAND PR, 2009, P 61 ANN M AC NEUR A
[9]
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy [J].
Lipton, R. B. ;
Bigal, M. E. ;
Diamond, M. ;
Freitag, F. ;
Reed, M. L. ;
Stewart, W. F. .
NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (05) :343-349
[10]
LIPTON RB, 2008, P 50 ANN SCI M AM HE