Cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin for the prevention of coronary and stroke events:: an economic analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial lipid-lowering arm (ASCOT-LLA)

被引:35
作者
Lindgren, P
Buxton, M
Kahan, T
Poulter, NR
Dahlöf, B
Sever, PS
Wedel, H
Jönsson, B
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Ctr Hlth Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Hlth Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Brunel Univ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[5] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[7] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Nordic Sch Publ Hlth, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION | 2005年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
primary prevention; atorvastatin; costs; Sweden; UK;
D O I
10.1097/00149831-200502000-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the lipid-lowering arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT-LLA) where patients from seven countries with hypertension and no history of coronary heart disease (CHD) were randomized to receive 10 mg atorvastatin or placebo. Design Economic analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Methods Data on resource use were aggregated for all patients during the entire trial period (median 3.3 years) and multiplied with unit costs for Sweden and the UK. The total number of cardiovascular events and procedures avoided was used as the measure of effectiveness. Results Patients treated with atorvastatin had an additional net costs of 449 C (4114 SEK) in Sweden and 414 EURO (POUND260) in the UK, but fewer events per patient (0.097 compared to 0.132). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 12673 EURO (116119 SEK) and 11693 EURO (POUND7349) per event avoided. Conclusion Based on comparisons with the WOSCOPS and 4S studies, atorvastatin at 10 mg to treat patients as in the ASCOT study, appears to be a cost-effective strategy. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ANNEMANS L, 2003, BR J MED EC, V6, P55
[2]   The west of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin [J].
Caro, J ;
Klittich, W ;
McGuire, A ;
Ford, J ;
Norrie, J ;
Pettitt, D ;
McMurray, J ;
Shepherd, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7122) :1577-1582
[3]  
Cook JR, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P2989, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001115)19:21<2989::AID-SIM599>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-G
[5]  
Curtis, 2003, UNIT COSTS HLTH SOCI
[6]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, NHS REF COSTS
[7]  
*FASS, 2002, OFF DRUG PRIC LIST
[8]  
*FED COUNT COUNC, 1999, COST PAT PHYS VIS BE
[9]   European comparison of costs and quality in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (2000-2001) [J].
Gandjour, A ;
Kleinschmit, F ;
Lauterbach, KW .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (11) :858-868
[10]   Cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease [J].
Johannesson, M ;
Jonsson, B ;
Kjekshus, J ;
Olsson, AG ;
Pedersen, TR ;
Wedel, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (05) :332-336