'Wags', 'Wives' and 'Mothers' ... But what about Women Politicians?

被引:22
作者
Campbell, Rosie [1 ]
Childs, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Birkbeck, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/pa/gsq022
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The UK general election of 2010 should have been a critical one for women. But it was not to be. Despite all of the main political parties claiming to want more women MPs the increase in their number relative to the 2005 Parliament was just 2.5%. Women remain under-represented numerically in the House of Commons, constituting less than one-quarter of all MPs. The election campaign was largely women free too, as women married to politicians gained more attention than women politicians. Moreover, and despite enhanced inter-party competition over the women's vote-or rather, and more accurately, the votes of middle income mothers, otherwise known as the 'mumsnet' vote-women's issues and perspectives were marginalised from the campaign proper.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 777
页数:18
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J LIBERAL HIST
[2]  
ASHE I, 2010, BRIT POLITI IN PRESS
[3]  
BENNETT C, 2010, OBSERVER 0509
[4]  
CAMPBELL R, 2008, IEPOP, V18, P53
[5]  
CAMPBELL R, 2006, GENDER VOTE GREAT BR
[6]  
Campbell R., 2006, GENDER VOTE BRITAIN
[7]   Do Women Need Women Representatives? [J].
Campbell, Rosie ;
Childs, Sarah ;
Lovenduski, Joni .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 40 :171-194
[8]  
Childs S., 2005, BRITAIN DECIDES UK G, P150
[9]  
CHILDS S, GENDER CONSERVATIVE
[10]  
CHILDS S, POLITICS GE IN PRESS