Comparison of measured and modeled surface ozone concentrations at two different sites in Europe during the solar eclipse on August 11, 1999

被引:21
作者
Zanis, P
Zerefos, CS
Gilge, S
Melas, D
Balis, D
Ziomas, I
Gerasopoulos, E
Tzoumaka, P
Kaminski, U
Fricke, W
机构
[1] Aristotelian Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Phys, Lab Atmospher Phys, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotelian Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Nucl Phys, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
surface ozone; NOx; solar eclipse; troposphere; photochemistry; box modeling;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00116-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of the solar eclipse on 11 August 1999 on surface ozone at two sites, Thessaloniki, Greece (urban site) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (elevated rural site) are investigated in this study and compared with model results. The eclipse offered a unique opportunity to test our understanding of tropospheric ozone chemistry and to investigate with a simple photochemical box model the response of surface ozone to changes of solar radiation during a photolytical perturbation such as the solar eclipse. The surface ozone measurements following the eclipse display a decrease of around 10-15 ppbv at the urban station of Eptapyrgio at Thessaloniki while at Hohenpeissenberg, the actual ozone data do not show any clear effect of eclipse on surface ozone. For Thessaloniki, the model results suggest that solely photochemistry can account for a significant amount of the observed surface ozone decrease during the eclipse but transport effects mask part of the photochemical effect of eclipse on surface ozone. For Hohenpeissenberg, the box model predicted an ozone decrease, due to the eclipse, of about 2 ppbv in relative agreement with the magnitude of the observed ozone decrease from the 2 h moving average while at the same time it inhibits the foreseen diurnal ozone increase. However, this modeled ozone decrease during the eclipse is small compared to the diurnal ozone variability due to transport effects, and hence. transport really masks such relative small changes. The different magnitude of the surface ozone decrease between the two sites indicates mainly the role of the NO(x) levels. Measured and modeled NO and NO(2) concentrations at Hohenpeissenberg during the eclipse are also compared and indicate that the partitioning of NO and NO(2) in NO(x) is influenced clearly from the eclipse. This is not observed at Thessaloniki due to local NO(x) sources. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4663 / 4673
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Hydroxyl radical and ozone measurements in England during the solar eclipse of 11 August 1999 [J].
Abram, JP ;
Creasey, DJ ;
Heard, DE ;
Lee, JD ;
Pilling, MJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (21) :3437-3440
[2]   Ozone in the marine boundary layer at Cape Grim: Model simulation [J].
Ayers, GP ;
Granek, H ;
Boers, R .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1997, 27 (02) :179-195
[3]   A possible photochemical link between stratospheric and near-surface ozone on Swiss mountain sites in late winter [J].
Brönnimann, S ;
Neu, U .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1998, 31 (03) :299-319
[4]   The influence of changing UVB radiation in near-surface ozone time series [J].
Brönnimann, S ;
Voigt, S ;
Wanner, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D7) :8901-8913
[5]   ATMOSPHERIC HYDROXYL RESPONSE TO THE PARTIAL SOLAR ECLIPSE OF MAY 30, 1984 [J].
BURNETT, CR ;
BURNETT, EB .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1985, 12 (05) :263-266
[6]  
CURTIS AR, 1987, FACSIMILE CHEKMAT US
[7]   A NEW SPHERICAL MODEL FOR COMPUTING THE RADIATION-FIELD AVAILABLE FOR PHOTOLYSIS AND HEATING AT TWILIGHT [J].
DAHLBACK, A ;
STAMNES, K .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1991, 39 (05) :671-683
[8]  
DeMore W.B., 1997, JPL PUBLICATION, P97
[9]  
*DEP ENV MUN THESS, 1999, RES AIR POLL MEAS MU
[10]  
ELTERMAN L, 1968, UV VISIBLE IR ALTITU